Department of Haematology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow G3 8SJ, Scotland, UK.
Br J Haematol. 2011 Nov;155(3):366-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08851.x. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
The Medical Research Council Acute Myeloid Leukaemia 12 (MRC AML12) trial (children) addressed the optimal anthracenedione/anthracycline in induction and the optimal number of courses of consolidation chemotherapy. 504 children (<16 years) with AML were randomized between mitoxantrone/cytarabine/etoposide or daunorubicin/cytarabine/etoposide as induction chemotherapy and 270 entered a second randomization between a total of four or five courses of treatment. Ten-year event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was 54% and 63% respectively; the relapse rate was 35%. There was no difference in complete remission rate between the induction regimens, but there was a benefit for mitoxantrone with regard to relapse rate [32% vs. 39%; Hazard ratio (HR) 0·73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·54, 1·00] and disease-free survival (DFS; 63% vs. 55%; HR 0·72; 95% CI 0·54, 0·96). However, this did not translate into a better EFS or OS (HR 0·84; 95% CI 0·63, 1·12). Results of the second randomization did not show a survival benefit for a fifth course of treatment (HR 1·01; 95% CI 0·63, 1·62), suggesting a ceiling of benefit for conventional chemotherapy and demonstrating the need for new agents. EFS was superior compared to the preceding trial AML10, partly due to fewer deaths in remission, highlighting the importance of supportive care.
医学研究委员会急性髓细胞白血病 12 号(MRC AML12)试验(儿童)解决了诱导治疗中最佳蒽环类药物/蒽环类药物和最佳巩固化疗疗程数的问题。504 名(<16 岁)AML 患儿被随机分为米托蒽醌/阿糖胞苷/依托泊苷或柔红霉素/阿糖胞苷/依托泊苷作为诱导化疗,其中 270 名患儿进入第二次随机分组,接受总共 4 或 5 个疗程的治疗。10 年无事件(EFS)和总生存(OS)率分别为 54%和 63%;复发率为 35%。两种诱导方案的完全缓解率无差异,但米托蒽醌在复发率方面有优势[32%对 39%;风险比(HR)0·73;95%置信区间(CI)0·54, 1·00]和无病生存(DFS;63%对 55%;HR 0·72;95% CI 0·54, 0·96)。然而,这并没有转化为更好的 EFS 或 OS(HR 0·84;95% CI 0·63, 1·12)。第二次随机分组的结果并未显示第五个疗程治疗有生存获益(HR 1·01;95% CI 0·63, 1·62),这表明常规化疗的获益有上限,并证明需要新的药物。EFS 优于先前的 AML10 试验,部分原因是缓解期的死亡人数减少,这突出了支持性护理的重要性。