• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减力闭合套管针穿刺技术:使用机械力测量仪分析套管针插入力

Reduced-force closed trocar entry technique: analysis of trocar insertion force using a mechanical force gauge.

作者信息

Fanning James, Shah Manish, Fenton Bradford

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pennsylvania State University, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):59-61. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13022985131219.

DOI:10.4293/108680811X13022985131219
PMID:21902944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3134697/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Trocar insertion injury has a high morbidity, mortality, and cost. The purpose of this study was to compare standard trocar entry with our reduced-force closed trocar entry technique by measuring trocar insertion force using a mechanical force gauge.

METHODS

In the operating room, the force gauge was inserted into a sterile glove and connected to the proximal portion of the trocar to measure insertion force. Through one incision, we used a standard closed trocar entry, while through the other incision, we used our reduced-force closed trocar entry technique. After making the skin incision and before trocar entry, we spread and dilated the skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia, and muscle with a hemostat.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients entered the trial and none were excluded. Median trocar insertion force was 3.3lb (range, 1.6 to 5.4) with our reduced-force trocar entry technique versus 6.5lb (range, 2.0 to 14.0) with the standard trocar entry (P=.001). No complications occurred with the reduced-force trocar entry technique.

CONCLUSION

Our reduced-force trocar entry technique decreases trocar insertion force by 50%, requires no additional instruments or cost and is fast and safe. Reduced-entry force pressure may decrease the risk of trocar insertion injury.

摘要

背景与目的

套管针穿刺损伤具有较高的发病率、死亡率及成本。本研究的目的是通过使用机械测力计测量套管针穿刺力,比较标准套管针穿刺与我们的减力闭合套管针穿刺技术。

方法

在手术室中,将测力计插入无菌手套并连接到套管针近端以测量穿刺力。通过一个切口,我们采用标准闭合套管针穿刺,而通过另一个切口,我们采用我们的减力闭合套管针穿刺技术。在切开皮肤后且在套管针穿刺前,我们用止血钳撑开并扩张皮肤、皮下组织、筋膜和肌肉。

结果

25例患者进入试验,无患者被排除。我们的减力套管针穿刺技术的套管针穿刺力中位数为3.3磅(范围为1.6至5.4),而标准套管针穿刺为6.5磅(范围为2.0至14.0)(P = 0.001)。减力套管针穿刺技术未发生并发症。

结论

我们的减力套管针穿刺技术可使套管针穿刺力降低50%,无需额外器械或成本,且快速安全。穿刺力降低可能会降低套管针穿刺损伤的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc4/3134697/3443fe452c33/jls0011126990002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc4/3134697/22e222b13dec/jls0011126990001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc4/3134697/3443fe452c33/jls0011126990002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc4/3134697/22e222b13dec/jls0011126990001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc4/3134697/3443fe452c33/jls0011126990002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reduced-force closed trocar entry technique: analysis of trocar insertion force using a mechanical force gauge.减力闭合套管针穿刺技术:使用机械力测量仪分析套管针插入力
JSLS. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):59-61. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13022985131219.
2
Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.腹腔镜入路:技术、科技与并发症综述
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 May;29(5):433-447. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35496-2.
3
Laparoscopic entry techniques.腹腔镜进入技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 31;8:CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.
4
Laparoscopic entry techniques.腹腔镜进入技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub3.
5
Direct trocar insertion without previous pneumoperitoneum versus insertion after insufflation with Veress needle in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜妇科手术中直接穿刺套管针(不预先建立气腹)与使用韦氏针充气后穿刺套管针插入的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Oct;39(7):1000-1005. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1590804. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
6
Randomized control trial on effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy.肥胖女性诊断性腹腔镜检查中直接套管针与Veress针穿刺技术有效性和安全性的随机对照试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Sep;304(3):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05957-w. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
7
Laparoscopic entry techniques.腹腔镜进入技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub5.
8
Comparison Of Operative Complications Of Direct Trocar Access Versus Veress Needle Insertion Technique For Initial Peritoneal Entry In Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery.妇科腹腔镜手术患者初始腹膜穿刺时直接套管针穿刺与Veress针穿刺技术手术并发症的比较
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2021 Apr-Jun;33(2):311-314.
9
Aiming for complete safety of first trocar insertion of laparoscopic surgery: usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography of umbilical region.追求腹腔镜手术第一套管针插入的完全安全性:脐区术前超声检查的实用性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Mar;45(3):652-656. doi: 10.1111/jog.13880. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
Modified Open Laparoscopy Using a 5-mm Laparoscope.改良式经 5mm 腹腔镜下手术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;127(3):535-538. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001202.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic major gynecologic surgery in patients with prior laparotomy bowel resection.曾接受剖腹肠切除术患者的腹腔镜妇科大手术
JSLS. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):448-50. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13176785203833.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic cytoreduction for primary advanced ovarian cancer.原发性晚期卵巢癌的腹腔镜肿瘤细胞减灭术
JSLS. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):80-2. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12674612014707.
2
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for uteri weighing 1000 grams or more.腹腔镜辅助下对重量达1000克及以上子宫进行的阴道子宫切除术。
JSLS. 2008 Oct-Dec;12(4):376-9.
3
Robotic radical hysterectomy.机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;198(6):649.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.002.
4
Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.腹腔镜入路:技术、科技与并发症综述
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 May;29(5):433-447. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35496-2.
5
Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force, and defect size.五种不同腹部穿刺套管系统的比较:插入力、拔出力及缺损大小分析
Surg Innov. 2006 Sep;13(3):183-9. doi: 10.1177/1553350606294247.
6
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub2.
7
Feasibility of laparoscopic debulking with electrosurgical loop excision procedure and argon beam coagulator at recurrence in patients with previous laparotomy debulking.对于既往接受过剖腹减瘤手术的患者,在复发时采用电外科环形切除术和氩离子束凝固器进行腹腔镜减瘤手术的可行性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;190(5):1394-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.034.
8
Measurement of trocar insertion force using a piezoelectric transducer.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Nov;10(4):534-8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60162-4.
9
Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中的套管针损伤
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Jun;192(6):677-83. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00913-9.
10
Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cost, cause, and consequences.涉及腹腔镜胆囊切除术的医疗事故诉讼。成本、原因及后果。
Arch Surg. 1997 Apr;132(4):392-7; discussion 397-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280066009.