Suppr超能文献

比较湿热消毒法和环氧乙烷气体消毒法对重复使用的内镜活检钳的灭菌效果。

Comparison of sterilization of reusable endoscopic biopsy forceps by autoclaving and ethylene oxide gas.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Feb;57(2):405-12. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1884-7. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Every country has standardized reprocessing guidelines for reducing the risk of microorganism transmission via reusable biopsy forceps. Sterilization is performed either by autoclaving or with the use of ethylene oxide (EO) gas. However, there are no clear standard global recommendations. The aim of this study was to determine whether EO gas or autoclaving is a safer and more effective method for the sterilization of reusable forceps.

METHODS

This was a prospective study conducted at multiple tertiary referral centers. Seventy reusable biopsy forceps that had been reused at least 20 times each were collected from six endoscopy centers. In all, 61 forceps from five centers were sterilized using EO gas, and the nine forceps from the remaining center were placed in an autoclave. We performed real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus and performed bacterial cultures on the reusable forceps, which were cut into 2- to 3-cm sections. The forceps were also scanned with an electron microscope (EM) to detect surface damage and contamination.

RESULTS

Escherichia coli bacteria were cultured from 2 of the 61 (3.3%) reusable biopsy forceps sterilized with EO gas. On EM scanning, abundant debris and tissue materials remained on the cup surfaces of the reused biopsy forceps and on their inner wires. No microorganisms were found on the autoclaved forceps.

CONCLUSIONS

Sterilization with EO gas may be inadequate because the complicated structure of the forceps may interfere with sterilization. Therefore, for optimum safety, reusable biopsy forceps should be sterilized by autoclaving.

摘要

背景与目的

每个国家都有标准化的再处理指南,以降低可重复使用活检钳传播微生物的风险。消毒方法可以采用高压灭菌或环氧乙烷(EO)气体。然而,目前全球并没有明确的标准推荐。本研究旨在确定EO 气体或高压灭菌对于可重复使用的活检钳的消毒,哪种方法更安全、更有效。

方法

这是一项在多个三级转诊中心进行的前瞻性研究。从六个内镜中心收集了至少重复使用 20 次的 70 个可重复使用活检钳。共有 5 个中心的 61 个活检钳采用 EO 气体进行消毒,其余 1 个中心的 9 个活检钳放入高压灭菌器中。我们对结核分枝杆菌和乙型肝炎病毒进行实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测,并对可重复使用的活检钳进行细菌培养,将活检钳切成 2-3 厘米的小段。还使用电子显微镜(EM)扫描活检钳,以检测表面损伤和污染情况。

结果

用 EO 气体消毒的 61 个(3.3%)可重复使用活检钳中有 2 个培养出大肠杆菌。在 EM 扫描中,再使用的活检钳杯表面及其内部金属丝上仍残留大量碎片和组织材料。在高压灭菌的活检钳上未发现微生物。

结论

EO 气体消毒可能不够充分,因为活检钳的复杂结构可能会干扰消毒效果。因此,为了达到最佳的安全性,可重复使用的活检钳应采用高压灭菌进行消毒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验