Dermatopathologie Bodensee, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
Mod Pathol. 2012 Jan;25(1):75-85. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.134. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Postradiation cutaneous vascular lesions after treatment of breast carcinoma comprise a heterogeneous group of benign, atypical, and malignant lesions and are best regarded as points along a morphological spectrum. We analyzed a series of cutaneous angiosarcomas after treatment of breast cancer in comparison with control cases and cases of atypical vascular lesions with special emphasis on the expression and amplification of MYC. The 66 cases were divided into control cases (5), cases in which a slight vascular proliferation was seen after radiotherapy of breast cancer (12), cases of atypical vascular lesions after radiotherapy (16), cases of postradiation cutaneous angiosarcomas (25), and cases of angiosarcomas of skin and soft tissues unrelated to radiotherapy (8). None of the control cases (2 M, 3 F, 20-76 years), of cases showing slight vascular proliferation, dermal fibrosis and inflammation after radiotherapy of breast cancer (12 F, 48-79 years), of cases of atypical vascular lesions after radiotherapy (16 F, 29-81 years), and of cases of angiosarcomas of skin and soft tissues unrelated to radiotherapy (3 M, 5 F, 25-92 years) showed an amplification of MYC by FISH analysis. In striking contrast, in all cases of postradiation cutaneous angiosarcomas (25 F, 46-95 years), MYC amplification was found by FISH analysis in a variable number of counted nuclei. Immunohistochemically, strong positive nuclear staining for MYC and prox-1 was seen in cases of postradiation cutaneous angiosarcoma, whereas control cases and cases of atypical vascular proliferation after radiotherapy were negative for MYC, and stained only focally positive for prox-1 in a number of cases. In conclusion, the presence of MYC amplification represents an important additional diagnostic tool in the distinction of postradiation cutaneous angiosarcomas from atypical vascular lesions after radiotherapy. Immunohistochemical stainings for MYC are useful for mapping of these lesions and for careful tumor margin control.
乳腺癌治疗后放射性皮肤血管病变包括一组良性、非典型和恶性病变,最好被视为形态学谱上的一个点。我们分析了一系列乳腺癌治疗后的皮肤血管肉瘤病例,并与对照病例和放疗后非典型血管病变病例进行了比较,特别强调了 MYC 的表达和扩增。66 例病例分为对照组(5 例)、乳腺癌放疗后轻度血管增生病例(12 例)、放疗后非典型血管病变病例(16 例)、放疗后皮肤血管肉瘤病例(25 例)和与放疗无关的皮肤软组织血管肉瘤病例(8 例)。对照组(2 例男性,3 例女性,20-76 岁)、乳腺癌放疗后轻度血管增生、真皮纤维化和炎症病例(12 例女性,48-79 岁)、放疗后非典型血管病变病例(16 例女性,29-81 岁)和与放疗无关的皮肤软组织血管肉瘤病例(3 例男性,5 例女性,25-92 岁)中,均未通过 FISH 分析显示 MYC 扩增。与此形成鲜明对比的是,所有放疗后皮肤血管肉瘤病例(25 例女性,46-95 岁)中,通过 FISH 分析在一定数量的计数核中发现了 MYC 扩增。免疫组化分析显示,放疗后皮肤血管肉瘤病例的 MYC 和 prox-1 核染色强阳性,而对照组和放疗后非典型血管增生病例的 MYC 均为阴性,在一些病例中仅局灶性 prox-1 阳性染色。总之,MYC 扩增的存在是鉴别放疗后皮肤血管肉瘤与放疗后非典型血管病变的重要附加诊断工具。MYC 免疫组化染色可用于这些病变的定位和仔细的肿瘤边缘控制。