Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, China.
Epileptic Disord. 2011 Dec;13(4):349-65. doi: 10.1684/epd.2011.0444.
In recent years, phenobarbital, as an antiepileptic drug, has become less popular based on adverse events, especially cognitive and behavioural side effects. Despite the development of better tolerated new generation AEDs, phenobarbital is still widely used particularly in developing countries because of its low cost. The purpose of this review was to: (i) investigate whether phenobarbital can be safely used as an antiepileptic drug and (ii) determine the questions which need to be addressed in order to comprehensively and adequately evaluate the safety of phenobarbital for the treatment of epilepsy.
The literature was searched using the Cochrane Central Register of randomised controlled trials (1800-2009), Medline (1966-2009), Embase (1966-2009) and three Chinese databases.
Twenty studies were finally included in this systematic review. The determination of adverse effects of combined antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) from different studies was complicated by numerous factors including study design, different descriptions of adverse events and a lack of standardised data collection. These factors may also have been responsible for the heterogeneity present in the meta-analysis. The data did not demonstrate any evidence of association between phenobarbital and a higher risk of adverse events. However, phenobarbital appeared to be associated with a higher rate of adverse drug reaction related withdrawal (ADR-related withdraw), compared to carbamazepine, valproic acid and phenytoin. This may have been due to a concern for possible adverse effects of phenobarbital.
Phenobarbital was associated with a higher rate of drug withdrawal although there was no evidence to suggest that phenobarbital caused more adverse events compared to carbamazepine, valproic acid or phenytoin. However, in the case of pregnant women, it is important for clinicians to evaluate the benefits and risks of phenobarbital administration before making a final recommendation. Furthermore, unified scales for the assessment of cognitive function should be applied for future studies particularly in children.
近年来,由于不良反应,特别是认知和行为方面的副作用,苯巴比妥作为抗癫痫药物的应用已减少。尽管开发了更好耐受的新一代抗癫痫药物,但由于成本低,苯巴比妥仍在许多国家广泛使用,特别是在发展中国家。本综述的目的是:(i)研究苯巴比妥是否可安全地用作抗癫痫药物;(ii)确定为全面和充分评估苯巴比妥治疗癫痫的安全性需要解决的问题。
使用 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(1800-2009 年)、Medline(1966-2009 年)、Embase(1966-2009 年)和三个中文数据库进行文献检索。
本系统综述最终纳入了 20 项研究。不同研究中联合抗癫痫药物(AED)不良反应的确定受到许多因素的影响,包括研究设计、不良事件的不同描述以及缺乏标准化数据收集。这些因素也可能是荟萃分析中存在异质性的原因。数据没有显示苯巴比妥与不良事件风险增加之间存在任何关联。然而,与卡马西平、丙戊酸和苯妥英钠相比,苯巴比妥似乎与更高的不良反应相关停药率(ADR-related withdraw)相关。这可能是由于担心苯巴比妥可能存在不良反应。
尽管没有证据表明苯巴比妥比卡马西平、丙戊酸或苯妥英钠引起更多的不良事件,但苯巴比妥与更高的药物停药率相关。然而,对于孕妇,在做出最终建议之前,临床医生评估苯巴比妥给药的益处和风险非常重要。此外,特别是在儿童中,未来的研究应使用统一的认知功能评估量表。