Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012 Jul;83(1):112-22. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
In the last 5 years inhibitors of the VEGF/VEGFR and mTOR pathways have dramatically changed the therapeutic approach to metastatic renal cancer. Randomized controlled trials have shown that six targeted agents--sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, bevacizumab, everolimus and pazopanib--are able to improve patient outcome. Even if the choice of drug for first-line therapy is quite well defined, to date it is not easy to characterize and evaluate the efficacy of new therapies in second-line treatment. It is not clear whether, after first-line therapy with a VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor, use of mTOR or a second TKI inhibitor should be recommended. In this review we report on current evidence supporting the use of targeted agents in second-line therapy. Therefore we try to combine current clinical results with a practical clinical approach, with the goal of evaluating the best clinical decision for different clinical situations.
在过去的 5 年中,VEGF/VEGFR 和 mTOR 通路抑制剂显著改变了转移性肾细胞癌的治疗方法。随机对照试验表明,六种靶向药物——索拉非尼、舒尼替尼、替西罗莫司、贝伐珠单抗、依维莫司和帕唑帕尼——能够改善患者的预后。尽管一线治疗药物的选择已经相当明确,但迄今为止,要确定和评估二线治疗中新疗法的疗效并不容易。目前尚不清楚在一线使用 VEGF/VEGFR 抑制剂后,是否应该推荐使用 mTOR 或第二种 TKI 抑制剂。在这篇综述中,我们报告了支持在二线治疗中使用靶向药物的现有证据。因此,我们试图将当前的临床结果与实际的临床方法相结合,以评估不同临床情况下的最佳临床决策。