Suppr超能文献

再感染的翻修 TKA 可通过积极的治疗方案和抗生素输注来解决。

Reinfected revised TKA resolves with an aggressive protocol and antibiotic infusion.

机构信息

Missouri Bone and Joint Center, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):236-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2087-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revision of failed two-stage revision TKA for infection is challenging, and amputation often is the only alternative.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether reinfection after two-stage revision for infection could be controlled with an aggressive revision protocol and intraarticular antibiotic infusion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients (12 women, six men) who underwent revision for failed reimplantation between January 1999 and January 2008. Mean time from revision for infection to rerevision for reinfection was 5 months (range, 1-18 months). All knees were treated with an individualized protocol that included aggressive exposure, extensive débridement, uncemented components, closure with muscle flaps (seven knees) and other plastic surgery procedures (three knees), and direct antibiotic infusion through Hickman catheters for 6 weeks. Ten knees had one-stage revision; five had débridement, cement spacer, and revision surgery 3 to 4 months later; and three had extensive soft tissue reconstruction before revision surgery. The minimum followup was 2.3 years (mean, 6.1 years; range, 2.3-12.0 years).

RESULTS

The mean Knee Society scores improved from 33 preoperatively to 76. Seventeen of the 18 had control of infection and achieved durable fixation and a closed wound. One patient had recurrent infection 13 months after one-stage revision, was revised, and remained asymptomatic 28 months postoperatively after redébridement and vancomycin infusion for 6 weeks. In one patient, soft tissue closure was not obtained and the patient required amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensile exposure, débridement, and soft tissue flaps for closure combined with uncemented fixation of revision implants and antibiotic infusion into the knee controlled reinfection after revision TKA.

摘要

背景

翻修失败的两阶段翻修 TKA 以治疗感染具有挑战性,截肢通常是唯一的选择。

问题/目的:我们想知道在两阶段翻修治疗感染后,是否可以通过积极的翻修方案和关节内抗生素输注来控制再次感染。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 1999 年 1 月至 2008 年 1 月期间因感染而进行翻修的 18 例患者(12 名女性,6 名男性)。从感染性翻修到再次感染性翻修的平均时间为 5 个月(范围,1-18 个月)。所有膝关节均采用个体化方案治疗,包括积极暴露、广泛清创、非骨水泥型假体、肌肉瓣闭合(7 例膝关节)和其他整形手术(3 例膝关节),并通过 Hickman 导管直接进行 6 周的抗生素输注。10 例进行了一期翻修,5 例在清创、骨水泥间隔器和 3-4 个月后的翻修手术,3 例在翻修手术前进行了广泛的软组织重建。最小随访时间为 2.3 年(平均 6.1 年;范围,2.3-12.0 年)。

结果

18 例患者中有 17 例的膝关节学会评分从术前的 33 分提高到 76 分。18 例患者中有 17 例控制了感染,并获得了持久的固定和封闭的伤口。1 例患者在一期翻修后 13 个月再次发生感染,经翻修后,在 6 周万古霉素输注和清创后 28 个月仍无症状。1 例患者未能闭合软组织,行截肢术。

结论

广泛的暴露、清创和软组织瓣闭合,结合非骨水泥型假体的翻修固定和膝关节内抗生素输注,可控制翻修 TKA 后的再次感染。

相似文献

1
Reinfected revised TKA resolves with an aggressive protocol and antibiotic infusion.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):236-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2087-4.
3
One-stage Revision With Catheter Infusion of Intraarticular Antibiotics Successfully Treats Infected THA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):419-429. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4977-y.
4
Two-stage approach to primary TKA in infected arthritic knees using intraoperatively molded articulating cement spacers.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2201-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3545-6. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection With a Two-stage Protocol Using Static Spacers.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):120-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4443-2.
10

引用本文的文献

5
Local antibiotic delivery via intra-articular catheter infusion for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec;144(12):5177-5189. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05341-2. Epub 2024 May 1.
6
Intra-articular Vancomycin Reduces Prosthetic Infection in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Feb 24;26:101333. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101333. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
The use of intra-articular vancomycin is safe in primary hip and knee arthroplasty.
J Orthop. 2023 Nov 4;46:161-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.017. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Adjuvant intra-articular vancomycin for recalcitrant Staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections of the knee.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1031-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03764-y. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
9
Local Antibiotic Delivery Options in Prosthetic Joint Infection.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;12(4):752. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040752.

本文引用的文献

1
Reinfection after prior staged reimplantation for septic total knee arthroplasty: is salvage still possible?
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
3
Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug;468(8):2052-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1308-6.
4
Two-stage exchange knee arthroplasty: does resistance of the infecting organism influence the outcome?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug;468(8):2060-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1296-6.
5
Generic tobramycin elutes from bone cement faster than proprietary tobramycin.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jun;466(6):1372-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0199-2. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
6
Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons.
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4 Suppl 1):106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.002.
7
Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection involving resistant organisms.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1227-31. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01192.
8
Higher risk of failure of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Aug;461:48-53. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181123d4e.
9
Comparative study of antimicrobial release kinetics from polymethylmethacrylate.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Apr;445:239-44. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000201167.90313.40.
10
Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and slime excretion on antibiotic-loaded bone cement.
Acta Orthop. 2005 Feb;76(1):109-14. doi: 10.1080/00016470510030427.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验