Missouri Bone and Joint Center, St Louis, MO, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):236-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2087-4.
Revision of failed two-stage revision TKA for infection is challenging, and amputation often is the only alternative.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether reinfection after two-stage revision for infection could be controlled with an aggressive revision protocol and intraarticular antibiotic infusion.
We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients (12 women, six men) who underwent revision for failed reimplantation between January 1999 and January 2008. Mean time from revision for infection to rerevision for reinfection was 5 months (range, 1-18 months). All knees were treated with an individualized protocol that included aggressive exposure, extensive débridement, uncemented components, closure with muscle flaps (seven knees) and other plastic surgery procedures (three knees), and direct antibiotic infusion through Hickman catheters for 6 weeks. Ten knees had one-stage revision; five had débridement, cement spacer, and revision surgery 3 to 4 months later; and three had extensive soft tissue reconstruction before revision surgery. The minimum followup was 2.3 years (mean, 6.1 years; range, 2.3-12.0 years).
The mean Knee Society scores improved from 33 preoperatively to 76. Seventeen of the 18 had control of infection and achieved durable fixation and a closed wound. One patient had recurrent infection 13 months after one-stage revision, was revised, and remained asymptomatic 28 months postoperatively after redébridement and vancomycin infusion for 6 weeks. In one patient, soft tissue closure was not obtained and the patient required amputation.
Extensile exposure, débridement, and soft tissue flaps for closure combined with uncemented fixation of revision implants and antibiotic infusion into the knee controlled reinfection after revision TKA.
翻修失败的两阶段翻修 TKA 以治疗感染具有挑战性,截肢通常是唯一的选择。
问题/目的:我们想知道在两阶段翻修治疗感染后,是否可以通过积极的翻修方案和关节内抗生素输注来控制再次感染。
我们回顾性分析了 1999 年 1 月至 2008 年 1 月期间因感染而进行翻修的 18 例患者(12 名女性,6 名男性)。从感染性翻修到再次感染性翻修的平均时间为 5 个月(范围,1-18 个月)。所有膝关节均采用个体化方案治疗,包括积极暴露、广泛清创、非骨水泥型假体、肌肉瓣闭合(7 例膝关节)和其他整形手术(3 例膝关节),并通过 Hickman 导管直接进行 6 周的抗生素输注。10 例进行了一期翻修,5 例在清创、骨水泥间隔器和 3-4 个月后的翻修手术,3 例在翻修手术前进行了广泛的软组织重建。最小随访时间为 2.3 年(平均 6.1 年;范围,2.3-12.0 年)。
18 例患者中有 17 例的膝关节学会评分从术前的 33 分提高到 76 分。18 例患者中有 17 例控制了感染,并获得了持久的固定和封闭的伤口。1 例患者在一期翻修后 13 个月再次发生感染,经翻修后,在 6 周万古霉素输注和清创后 28 个月仍无症状。1 例患者未能闭合软组织,行截肢术。
广泛的暴露、清创和软组织瓣闭合,结合非骨水泥型假体的翻修固定和膝关节内抗生素输注,可控制翻修 TKA 后的再次感染。