Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University Sapporo, Japan.
Front Neurosci. 2011 Sep 16;5:101. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00101. eCollection 2011.
This study examined instantaneous and cumulative effects of competitive interactions on impulsiveness in the inter-temporal choices in domestic chicks. Chicks were trained to peck colored beads to gain delayed food rewards (1 or 6 grains of millet delivered after a delay ranging between 0 and 4.5 s), and were tested in binary choices between a small-short delay option (SS) and a large-long delay alternative (LL). To examine whether competitive foraging instantaneously changes impulsiveness, we intraindividually compared choices between two consecutive tests in different contexts, one with competitors and another without. We found that (1) the number of the choice of LL was not influenced by competition in the tests, but (2) the operant peck latency was shortened by competition, suggesting a socially enhanced incentive for food. To further examine the lasting changes, two groups of chicks were consecutively trained and tested daily for 2 weeks according to a "behavioral titration" procedure, one with competitors and another without. Inter-group comparisons of the choices revealed that (3) choice impulsiveness gradually decreased along development, while (4) the chicks trained in competition maintained a higher level of impulsiveness. These results suggest that competitive foraging causes impulsive choices not by direct/contextual modification. Causal link between the instantaneous enhancement of incentive and the gradual effects on impulsiveness remains to be examined. Some (yet unspecified) factors may be indirectly involved.
本研究考察了竞争相互作用对鸡类在时间选择中冲动行为的即时和累积效应。鸡被训练啄彩色珠子以获得延迟的食物奖励(在 0 到 4.5 秒之间的延迟后获得 1 或 6 颗小米),并在小短延迟选项(SS)和大长延迟替代选项(LL)之间进行二元选择测试。为了研究竞争觅食是否即时改变冲动行为,我们在不同情境下对两个连续测试中的个体进行了比较,一个有竞争者,另一个没有。我们发现:(1)在测试中,竞争并不影响对 LL 的选择次数;(2)操作啄潜伏期因竞争而缩短,这表明食物的社会激励增强。为了进一步研究持久变化,两组鸡按照“行为滴定”程序连续每天训练和测试 2 周,一组有竞争者,另一组没有。组间比较表明:(3)冲动性选择随着发育逐渐降低,而(4)在竞争中训练的鸡保持较高的冲动性水平。这些结果表明,竞争觅食不是通过直接/情境修改导致冲动选择。激励的即时增强与对冲动性的逐渐影响之间的因果关系仍有待研究。一些(但未具体说明)因素可能间接涉及其中。