Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Plainsboro, NJ, USA.
J Med Econ. 2011;14(6):777-86. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.625066. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
To compare second-generation antipsychotics on time to and cost of psychiatric hospitalization in Medicaid beneficiaries with bipolar disorder.
Retrospective study using healthcare claims from 10 US state Medicaid programs. Included beneficiaries were aged 18-64, initiated a single second-generation antipsychotic (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone) between 1/1/2003-6/30/2008 (initiation date=index), and had a medical claim with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for bipolar disorder. A 360-day post-index period was used to measure time to and costs of psychiatric hospitalization (inpatient claims with a diagnosis code for a mental disorder [ICD-9-CM 290.xx-319.xx] in any position). Cox proportional hazards models and Generalized Linear Models compared time to and costs of psychiatric hospitalization, respectively, in beneficiaries initiating aripiprazole vs each other second-generation antipsychotic, adjusting for beneficiaries' baseline characteristics.
Included beneficiary characteristics: mean age 36 years, 77% female, 80% Caucasian, aripiprazole (n=2553), mean time to psychiatric hospitalization or censoring=85 days; olanzapine (n=4702), 81 days; quetiapine (n=9327), 97 days; risperidone (n=4377), 85 days; ziprasidone (n=1520), 82 days. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, time to psychiatric hospitalization in beneficiaries initiating aripiprazole was longer compared to olanzapine (hazard ratio [HR]=1.52, p<0.001), quetiapine (HR=1.40, p<0.001), ziprasidone (HR=1.33, p=0.032), and risperidone, although the latter difference did not reach significance (HR=1.18, p=0.13). The adjusted costs of psychiatric hospitalization in beneficiaries initiating aripiprazole were significantly lower compared to those initiating quetiapine (incremental per-patient per-month difference=$42, 95% CI=$16-66, p<0.05), but not significantly lower for the other comparisons.
This study was based on a non-probability convenience sample of the Medicaid population. Analyses of administrative claims data are subject to coding and classification error.
Medicaid beneficiaries with bipolar disorder initiating aripiprazole had significantly longer time to psychiatric hospitalization than those initiating olanzapine, quetiapine, or ziprasidone, and significantly lower adjusted costs for psychiatric hospitalization than those initiating quetiapine.
比较第二代抗精神病药物在医疗补助受益的双相情感障碍患者中的精神病住院时间和成本。
使用来自美国 10 个州的医疗补助计划的医疗保健索赔进行回顾性研究。纳入的受益人为年龄在 18-64 岁之间的患者,在 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 6 月 30 日期间(起始日期=索引)开始使用单一第二代抗精神病药物(阿立哌唑、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮或齐拉西酮),并且在索引后 360 天内有一份 ICD-9-CM 诊断代码为双相情感障碍的医疗索赔。使用 Cox 比例风险模型和广义线性模型分别比较阿立哌唑与其他第二代抗精神病药物起始治疗的精神病住院时间和成本,同时调整受益人的基线特征。
纳入受益人的特征:平均年龄 36 岁,77%为女性,80%为白种人,阿立哌唑(n=2553),精神病住院或删失的平均时间为 85 天;奥氮平(n=4702),81 天;喹硫平(n=9327),97 天;利培酮(n=4377),85 天;齐拉西酮(n=1520),82 天。在调整了基线特征后,与奥氮平(风险比[HR]=1.52,p<0.001)、喹硫平(HR=1.40,p<0.001)、齐拉西酮(HR=1.33,p=0.032)相比,阿立哌唑起始治疗的精神病住院时间更长,而与利培酮相比,这一差异没有达到显著水平(HR=1.18,p=0.13)。与起始治疗使用喹硫平的患者相比,阿立哌唑起始治疗的精神病住院成本显著降低(每位患者每月差异增量为$42,95%置信区间为$16-66,p<0.05),但与其他药物比较,差异无统计学意义。
本研究基于医疗补助人群的非概率便利样本。行政索赔数据的分析受到编码和分类错误的影响。
与奥氮平、喹硫平或齐拉西酮相比,患有双相情感障碍的医疗补助受益患者使用阿立哌唑起始治疗的精神病住院时间明显更长,与使用喹硫平相比,调整后的精神病住院成本明显更低。