• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种治疗踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的解剖学方法。

An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries.

作者信息

Qamar Faisal, Kadakia Anish, Venkateswaran Balachandran

机构信息

Dewsbury and District Hospital, Dewsbury, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Nov-Dec;50(6):762-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2011.07.001
PMID:21962383
Abstract

Treatment of tibiofibular syndesmotic ankle injury remains controversial in regard to the best method, although surgeons agree that the goal of treatment is reduction and operative stabilization. Ideally, the implant should stabilize the syndesmosis and allow physiologic micromotion and early mobilization, and conventional screws are limited in this regard. We reviewed use of the Ankle TightRope(®) fixation device for repair of syndesmotic injuries. From April to September 2006, 16 patients with evidence of syndesmotic injury were treated by means of ankle fracture open reduction with internal fixation, combined with use of the Ankle TightRope(®) device for repair of the syndesmosis. The mean age of the 16 patients was 36.6 ± 16.71 (range 15 to 69) years; they were followed up for at least 2 years. Mean follow-up duration was 26 ± 3.94 (range 24 to 38) months. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score at 2-year follow-up was 86.88 ± 11.49 (range 48 to 100). The mean time to full weight-bearing was 4.5 ± 0.87 weeks. Two (12.5%) patients had postoperative superficial wound infections, each of which was treated with oral antibiotics. One (6.25%) patient had the TightRope(®) removed because of irritation from the knot. There was no failure of syndesmotic fixation, despite early weight-bearing in the postoperative phase. The results of this case series indicate that tibiofibular syndesmosis repair with the Ankle TightRope(®) yields satisfactory results.

摘要

尽管外科医生们一致认为治疗的目标是复位和手术稳定,但对于胫腓下联合踝关节损伤的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。理想情况下,植入物应稳定胫腓下联合并允许生理性微动和早期活动,而传统螺钉在这方面存在局限性。我们回顾了使用踝关节TightRope(®)固定装置修复胫腓下联合损伤的情况。2006年4月至9月,16例有胫腓下联合损伤证据的患者接受了踝关节骨折切开复位内固定治疗,并联合使用踝关节TightRope(®)装置修复胫腓下联合。16例患者的平均年龄为36.6±16.71岁(范围15至69岁);他们至少随访了2年。平均随访时间为26±3.94个月(范围24至38个月)。2年随访时美国矫形足踝协会的平均评分为86.88±11.49(范围48至100)。完全负重的平均时间为4.5±0.87周。2例(12.5%)患者术后出现浅表伤口感染,均经口服抗生素治疗。1例(6.25%)患者因绳结刺激而取出TightRope(®)。尽管术后早期负重,但胫腓下联合固定没有失败。该病例系列结果表明,使用踝关节TightRope(®)修复胫腓下联合可取得满意结果。

相似文献

1
An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries.一种治疗踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的解剖学方法。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Nov-Dec;50(6):762-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
2
Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series.Weber C型踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤的钛缆固定:一项多中心病例系列研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 May;27(4):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1882-8. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
3
A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较TightRope和下胫腓联合螺钉固定在下胫腓联合复位准确性及维持方面的效果,采用双侧计算机断层扫描进行评估。
Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
4
Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction.踝关节联合损伤的固定:经皮克氏针固定与联合螺钉固定治疗踝关节联合损伤的准确性比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):2828-35. doi: 10.1177/0363546512461480. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
5
Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification.踝关节联合损伤的钢丝固定:临床结果、并发症和技术改良。
Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):838-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
6
The use of TightRope fixation for ankle syndesmosis injuries: our experience.TightRope固定术在踝关节下胫腓联合损伤中的应用:我们的经验。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Dec;100(3):217-222. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0421-4. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
7
Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution.下胫腓螺钉的转归——寻求合理的解决方案
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.062. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
Delayed reduction and stabilization of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.
Foot Ankle Int. 2001 Jan;22(1):15-8. doi: 10.1177/107110070102200103.
9
Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization.不稳定踝关节骨折后的预后:下胫腓联合固定的效果
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jan;24(1):7-11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b1542c.
10
Does the Arthrex TightRope® provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? A 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes® in 37 patients.Arthrex TightRope®能否维持胫腓下联合的稳定性?对37例患者使用的64根TightRope®进行的2年随访。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;52(5):563-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Disclosed Industry Funding Does Not Increase Positive Outcomes in Studies on Suture Button Fixation for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.已披露的行业资助并不会增加踝关节下胫腓联合损伤缝线纽扣固定术研究的积极结果:一项系统评价。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Jun 19;10(2):24730114251341305. doi: 10.1177/24730114251341305. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Concomitant Fracture Radial Head and Shaft With Dislocation of the Distal Radioulnar Joint: A Rare Variant of the Essex-Lopresti Lesion.桡骨头和骨干同时骨折伴桡尺远侧关节脱位:一种罕见的 Essex-Lopresti 损伤变异型。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Aug 8;6(8). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00042. eCollection 2022 Aug 1.
3
Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries.
不稳定下胫腓联合损伤的循证外科治疗算法
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 10;11(2):331. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020331.
4
Suture Button versus Screw Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Injury and Expected Value Decision Analysis.用于胫腓骨远端损伤的缝线纽扣与螺钉固定及期望值决策分析
Cureus. 2021 Nov 25;13(11):e19890. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19890. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
The Impact of Suture Button Removal in Syndesmosis Fixation.下胫腓联合固定中缝线纽扣拆除的影响
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 21;10(16):3726. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163726.
6
Evaluating success rate and comparing complications of operative techniques used to treat chronic syndesmosis injuries.评估用于治疗慢性下胫腓联合损伤的手术技术的成功率并比较其并发症。
J Orthop. 2020 May 7;22:225-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.04.011. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
7
Ankle syndesmosis repair and rehabilitation in professional rugby league players: a case series report.职业橄榄球联盟球员的踝关节下胫腓联合修复与康复:病例系列报告
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017 Apr 1;3(1):e000175. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000175. eCollection 2017.
8
Current trends in the diagnosis and management of syndesmotic injury.下胫腓联合损伤的诊断与治疗现状
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Mar;10(1):94-103. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9389-4.
9
Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series.Weber C型踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤的钛缆固定:一项多中心病例系列研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 May;27(4):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1882-8. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
10
Management of syndesmotic injuries: What is the evidence?下胫腓联合损伤的管理:证据是什么?
World J Orthop. 2016 Nov 18;7(11):718-725. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i11.718.