Department of Psychology, Kingston University London, United Kingdom.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1874-86. doi: 10.1037/a0025589. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
Six experiments studied relative frequency judgment and recall of sequentially presented items drawn from 2 distinct categories (i.e., city and animal). The experiments show that judged frequencies of categories of sequentially encountered stimuli are affected by certain properties of the sequence configuration. We found (a) a first-run effect whereby people overestimated the frequency of a given category when that category was the first repeated category to occur in the sequence and (b) a dissociation between judgments and recall; respondents may judge 1 event more likely than the other and yet recall more instances of the latter. Specifically, the distribution of recalled items does not correspond to the frequency estimates for the event categories, indicating that participants do not make frequency judgments by sampling their memory for individual items as implied by other accounts such as the availability heuristic (Tversky & Kahneman, 1973) and the availability process model (Hastie & Park, 1986). We interpret these findings as reflecting the operation of a judgment heuristic sensitive to sequential patterns and offer an account for the relationship between memory and judged frequencies of sequentially encountered stimuli.
六个实验研究了从两个不同类别(即城市和动物)中顺序呈现的项目的相对频率判断和回忆。这些实验表明,对顺序出现的刺激类别的判断频率受到序列配置某些特性的影响。我们发现(a)首次运行效应,即当给定类别是序列中首次重复出现的类别时,人们会高估该类别的频率,(b)判断和回忆之间的分离;受访者可能会判断一个事件比另一个事件更有可能发生,但会回忆起更多后者的实例。具体来说,回忆项目的分布与事件类别的频率估计不对应,这表明参与者不会像其他解释(如可得性启发式(Tversky & Kahneman, 1973)和可用性过程模型(Hastie & Park, 1986)所暗示的那样,通过对单个项目的记忆进行抽样来做出频率判断。我们将这些发现解释为反映了对序列模式敏感的判断启发式的运作,并提供了一种解释顺序出现的刺激的记忆和判断频率之间关系的方法。