Boots R J, Lipman J, Lassig-Smith M, Stephens D P, Thomas J, Shehabi Y, Bass F, Anthony A, Long D, Seppelt I M, Weisbrodt L, Erickson S, Beca J, Sherring C, McGuiness S, Parke R, Stachowski E R, Boyd R, Howet B
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Sep;39(5):837-46. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900507.
During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, large numbers of patients had severe respiratory failure. High frequency oscillation ventilation was used as a salvage technique for profound hypoxaemia. Our aim was to compare this experience with high frequency oscillation ventilation during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic with the same period in 2008 by performing a three-month period prevalence study in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units. The main study end-points were clinical demographics, care delivery and survival. Nine intensive care units contributed data. During 2009 there were 22 H1N1 patients (17 adults, five children) and 10 non-H1N1 patients (five adults, five children), while in 2008, 18 patients (two adults, 16 children) received high frequency oscillation ventilation. The principal non-H1N1 high frequency oscillation ventilation indication was bacterial or viral pneumonia (56%). For H1N1 patients, the median duration of high frequency oscillation ventilation was 3.7 days (interquartile range 1.8 to 5) with concomitant therapies including recruitment manoeuvres (22%), prone ventilation (41%), inhaled prostacyclins (18%) and inhaled nitric oxide (36%). Seven patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, six having H1N1. Three patients had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation concurrently, two as salvage therapy following the commencement of high frequency oscillation ventilation. In 2008, no high frequency oscillation ventilation patient received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Overall hospital survival was 77% in H1N1 patients, while survival in patients having adjunctive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was similar to those receiving high frequency oscillation ventilation alone (65% compared to 71%, P = 1.00). Survival rates were comparable to published extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes. High frequency oscillation ventilation was used successfully as a rescue therapy for severe respiratory failure. High frequency oscillation ventilation was only available in a limited number of intensive care units during the H1N1 pandemic.
在2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行期间,大量患者出现严重呼吸衰竭。高频振荡通气被用作治疗严重低氧血症的挽救技术。我们的目的是通过在澳大利亚和新西兰的重症监护病房进行为期三个月的患病率研究,比较2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行期间高频振荡通气的经验与2008年同期的情况。主要研究终点为临床人口统计学、护理提供情况和生存率。九个重症监护病房提供了数据。2009年有22例甲型H1N1流感患者(17例成人,5例儿童)和10例非甲型H1N1流感患者(5例成人,5例儿童),而2008年有18例患者(2例成人,16例儿童)接受了高频振荡通气。非甲型H1N1流感患者高频振荡通气的主要指征是细菌性或病毒性肺炎(56%)。对于甲型H1N1流感患者,高频振荡通气的中位持续时间为3.7天(四分位间距为1.8至5天),同时进行的治疗包括肺复张手法(22%)、俯卧位通气(41%)、吸入前列环素(18%)和吸入一氧化氮(36%)。7例患者接受了体外膜肺氧合,其中6例为甲型H1N1流感患者。3例患者同时接受体外膜肺氧合,2例在高频振荡通气开始后作为挽救治疗。2008年,接受高频振荡通气的患者中没有一例接受体外膜肺氧合。甲型H1N1流感患者的总体医院生存率为77%,而接受辅助体外膜肺氧合的患者的生存率与仅接受高频振荡通气的患者相似(分别为65%和71%,P = 1.00)。生存率与已发表的体外膜肺氧合结果相当。高频振荡通气成功地用作严重呼吸衰竭的挽救治疗。在甲型H1N1流感大流行期间,高频振荡通气仅在少数重症监护病房可用。