• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文拉法辛与特异性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效和耐受性:已发表研究的荟萃分析。

Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine versus specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of published studies.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;27(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32834ce13f.

DOI:10.1097/YIC.0b013e32834ce13f
PMID:21971532
Abstract

Specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are considered as first-line treatment in major depressive disorder (MDD). There is evidence that venlafaxine may be more effective than several antidepressants in the treatment of MDD. This meta-analysis includes all published, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head trials, which compared venlafaxine and an SSRI in the treatment of MDD in adults. Twenty-six trials comparing venlafaxine with an SSRI were included (total participants: 5858). Meta-analysis using a random effect model showed that venlafaxine was superior to SSRIs in achieving remission [odds ratio (OR)=1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.0-1.28, P=0.05] and response (OR=1.17, 95% CI=1.03-1.34, P=0.02). Subgroup analysis found that venlafaxine had a significantly better response rate than fluoxetine (OR=1.28, 95% CI=1.05-1.55, P=0.01). There were no significant differences in response or remission between venlafaxine and other individual SSRIs. There was no significant difference in all cause discontinuation between venlafaxine and SSRIs (OR=1.10, 95% CI=0.97-1.25, P=0.15). Venlafaxine had significantly higher discontinuation due to adverse events compared with SSRIs (OR=1.41, 95% CI=1.10-1.79, P=0.006). The superior efficacy of venlafaxine over SSRIs is of clinical importance. However, higher rates of discontinuation due to adverse events for venlafaxine compared with SSRIs are a disadvantage. Findings of this meta-analysis that included only published studies were similar to those from meta-analysis that included unpublished data.

摘要

选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)被认为是治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的一线药物。有证据表明,文拉法辛在治疗 MDD 方面可能比几种抗抑郁药更有效。这项荟萃分析包括所有已发表的、随机的、双盲的、头对头的试验,这些试验比较了文拉法辛和 SSRI 在治疗成人 MDD 方面的疗效。共纳入 26 项比较文拉法辛与 SSRI 的试验(总参与者:5858 人)。使用随机效应模型的荟萃分析显示,文拉法辛在达到缓解[比值比(OR)=1.13,95%置信区间(CI)=1.0-1.28,P=0.05]和应答(OR=1.17,95%CI=1.03-1.34,P=0.02)方面优于 SSRI。亚组分析发现,文拉法辛的应答率明显优于氟西汀(OR=1.28,95%CI=1.05-1.55,P=0.01)。文拉法辛与其他个别 SSRI 之间在应答或缓解方面无显著差异。文拉法辛与 SSRI 之间的全因停药率无显著差异(OR=1.10,95%CI=0.97-1.25,P=0.15)。与 SSRI 相比,文拉法辛因不良反应导致停药的比例明显更高(OR=1.41,95%CI=1.10-1.79,P=0.006)。文拉法辛的疗效优于 SSRI,这具有重要的临床意义。然而,与 SSRI 相比,文拉法辛因不良反应导致停药的比例较高是一个不利因素。这项仅包括已发表研究的荟萃分析结果与包括未发表数据的荟萃分析结果相似。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine versus specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of published studies.文拉法辛与特异性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效和耐受性:已发表研究的荟萃分析。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;27(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32834ce13f.
2
The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.文拉法辛与其他抗抑郁药及安慰剂相比治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;259(3):172-85. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0849-0. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
3
Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.与传统选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂及文拉法辛缓释剂相比,艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006 Mar;31(2):122-31.
4
Efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of bupropion for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials comparison with venlafaxine.安非他酮治疗重度抑郁症的疗效、耐受性及可接受性:一项与文拉法辛比较的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Sep 27;7:1053-62. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S46849. eCollection 2013.
5
Re-evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine vs SSRI: meta-analysis.文拉法辛与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂疗效及耐受性的重新评估:荟萃分析
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Mar;196(4):511-20; discussion 521-2. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0975-9. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
6
Response and remission rates in different subpopulations with major depressive disorder administered venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or placebo.接受文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂或安慰剂治疗的不同亚组重度抑郁症患者的缓解率和应答率。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;62(11):869-77. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n1106.
7
Remission rates during treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.使用文拉法辛或选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗期间的缓解率。
Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;178:234-41. doi: 10.1192/bjp.178.3.234.
8
Discontinuation rates for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other second-generation antidepressants in outpatients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重度抑郁症门诊患者中5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂及其他第二代抗抑郁药的停药率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Mar;20(2):59-69. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200503000-00001.
9
A multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute major depressive disorder (MDD): a comparison of cost-effectiveness between venlafaxine, SSRIs and TCAs.急性重度抑郁症(MDD)的多国药物经济学评估:文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)的成本效益比较
Value Health. 2001 Jan-Feb;4(1):16-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001016.x.
10
Efficacy of venlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder who have unsustained or no response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an open-label, uncontrolled study.文拉法辛对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂反应不佳或无反应的重度抑郁症患者的疗效:一项开放标签、非对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2002 Jul;24(7):1194-200. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80029-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prescription and Nonprescription Drug Use Among People With Eating Disorders.饮食失调人群的处方药和非处方药使用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522406. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22406.
2
An Overview of the Systematic Reviews About the Efficacy of Fluvoxamine on Depression.氟伏沙明治疗抑郁症疗效的系统评价概述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 May 12;18(5):711. doi: 10.3390/ph18050711.
3
Neuroplasticity and Mechanisms of Action of Acute and Chronic Treatment with Antidepressants in Preclinical Studies.临床前研究中神经可塑性与抗抑郁药急性和慢性治疗的作用机制
Biomedicines. 2024 Nov 29;12(12):2744. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122744.
4
Are There Biological Correlates of Response to Yoga-Based Interventions in Depression? A Critical Scoping Review.抑郁症中基于瑜伽的干预措施反应的生物学相关性研究?一项批判性综述。
Brain Sci. 2024 May 25;14(6):543. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14060543.
5
Psychopharmacological properties and therapeutic profile of the antidepressant venlafaxine.抗抑郁药文拉法辛的精神药理学特性和治疗概况。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Sep;239(9):2735-2752. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06203-8. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
The sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with major depressive disorder receiving SSRIs as first-line antidepressant treatment in European countries.在欧洲国家,接受 SSRIs 作为一线抗抑郁药物治疗的重度抑郁症患者的社会人口学和临床特征。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jun;272(4):715-727. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01368-3. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Venlafaxine Mitigates Depressive-Like Behavior in Ovariectomized Rats by Activating the EPO/EPOR/JAK2 Signaling Pathway and Increasing the Serum Estradiol Level.文拉法辛通过激活 EPO/EPOR/JAK2 信号通路和增加血清雌二醇水平来减轻去卵巢大鼠的抑郁样行为。
Neurotherapeutics. 2019 Apr;16(2):404-415. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-00680-6.
8
Antidepressant use and risk of adverse outcomes in people aged 20-64 years: cohort study using a primary care database.抗抑郁药的使用与 20-64 岁人群不良结局风险的关系:一项基于初级保健数据库的队列研究。
BMC Med. 2018 Mar 8;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1022-x.
9
Challenging Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder: A Roadmap for Improved Therapeutics.挑战难治性重度抑郁症:改善治疗方法的路线图。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13(5):616-35. doi: 10.2174/1570159x13666150630173522.
10
Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial of the Efficacy of Venlafaxine Versus Citalopram in the Treatment of the Acute Phase of Major Depressive Disorder.文拉法辛与西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症急性期疗效的双盲随机临床试验
Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;9(2):e1041. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs1041. Epub 2015 Jun 1.