• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一些测试表现心理计量模型的合理测量类比。

Plausible measurement analogies to some psychometric models of test performance.

机构信息

MetaMetrics, Inc., Australia.

出版信息

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2011 Nov;64(3):478-97. doi: 10.1348/2044-8317.002004. Epub 2010 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1348/2044-8317.002004
PMID:21973097
Abstract

Psychometricians hypothesize that cognitive abilities such as reading, writing and spelling are measurable. However, they prefer to model item response probabilities than to study the internal structure of cognitive attributes. The theory of conjoint measurement, via its unique capacity to detect the quantitative structure of non-extensive attributes, can be used for the latter purpose. It is shown that conjoint systems analogous to the numerical composition rules advanced by the Rasch, many facet Rasch and two-parameter logistic models can be formulated using well-established axioms, representation theorems and proofs. Examples using empirical and synthetic data are presented. It was concluded that the lack of descriptive, behavioural theory remains the biggest obstacle to the scientific measurement of cognitive abilities.

摘要

心理学家假设,阅读、写作和拼写等认知能力是可衡量的。然而,他们更倾向于建立项目反应概率模型,而不是研究认知属性的内在结构。联合测量理论通过其独特的能力可以检测非广泛属性的数量结构,从而可以用于后者的目的。结果表明,类似于拉什、多方面拉什和二参数逻辑模型提出的数值构成规则的联合系统,可以使用既定的公理、表示定理和证明来构建。使用经验和合成数据的例子也被提出。结论是,缺乏描述性的行为理论仍然是科学测量认知能力的最大障碍。

相似文献

1
Plausible measurement analogies to some psychometric models of test performance.一些测试表现心理计量模型的合理测量类比。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2011 Nov;64(3):478-97. doi: 10.1348/2044-8317.002004. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
2
Investigating latent constructs with item response models: a MATLAB IRTm toolbox.用项目反应模型研究潜在结构:一个 MATLAB IRTm 工具箱。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1127-37. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1127.
3
Random parameter structure and the testlet model: extension of the Rasch testlet model.随机参数结构与测验题目模型:拉施测验题目模型的扩展
J Appl Meas. 2009;10(4):394-407.
4
Analyzing nonadditive conjoint structures: compounding events by Rasch model probabilities.分析非相加性联合结构:通过拉施模型概率复合事件
J Outcome Meas. 1998;2(3):191-221.
5
The psychometricians' fallacy: too clever by half?心理测量学家的谬误:聪明反被聪明误?
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 Feb;62(Pt 1):41-55. doi: 10.1348/000711007X243582. Epub 2007 Sep 29.
6
Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.使用拉施模型中的五个标准化项目拟合指数检测项目功能差异。
J Outcome Meas. 1999;3(3):233-47.
7
Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items.多项选择题中干扰项的拉施分析
J Outcome Meas. 1998;2(1):43-65.
8
The recovery of the density scale using a stochastic quasi-realization of additive conjoint measurement.使用加法联合测量的随机准实现来恢复密度标度。
J Appl Meas. 2003;4(3):269-81.
9
Rasch modeling of accuracy and confidence measures from cognitive tests.认知测试中准确性和置信度测量的拉施模型
J Appl Meas. 2013;14(3):232-48.
10
The shortened Raven Standard Progressive Matrices: item response theory-based psychometric analyses and normative data.《简化版瑞文标准推理测验:基于项目反应理论的心理计量学分析和常模数据》
Assessment. 2013 Feb;20(1):48-59. doi: 10.1177/1073191111415999. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Educational assessment without numbers.无数字的教育评估。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 2;15:1399317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1399317. eCollection 2024.
2
A Multidimensional Model to Facilitate Within Person Comparison of Attributes.多维模型促进属性的个体内比较。
Psychometrika. 2024 Mar;89(1):296-316. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09946-1. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Rating scales institutionalise a network of logical errors and conceptual problems in research practices: A rigorous analysis showing ways to tackle psychology's crises.
评分量表将研究实践中的一系列逻辑错误和概念问题制度化:一项严谨的分析揭示了解决心理学危机的方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 28;13:1009893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009893. eCollection 2022.
4
On Bayesian Testing of Additive Conjoint Measurement Axioms Using Synthetic Likelihood.基于合成似然的加法联合测量公理的贝叶斯检验
Psychometrika. 2018 Jun;83(2):321-332. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9581-x. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
5
An analysis of item response theory and Rasch models based on the most probable distribution method.基于最可能分布方法的项目反应理论和拉施模型分析。
Psychometrika. 2014 Jul;79(3):377-402. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9348-y. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
6
An implicit measure of associations with mental illness versus physical illness: response latency decomposition and stimuli differential functioning in relation to IAT order of associative conditions and accuracy.与精神疾病和身体疾病关联的内隐测量:反应潜伏期分解以及与内隐联想测验(IAT)关联条件顺序和准确性相关的刺激差异功能
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 7;9(7):e101911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101911. eCollection 2014.
7
Evaluating the equal-interval hypothesis with test score scales.使用测试分数量表评估等距假设。
Psychometrika. 2014 Jan;79(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9342-4. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
8
Additive conjoint measurement and the resistance toward falsifiability in psychology.加法联合测量与心理学中的可证伪性阻力
Front Psychol. 2013 May 6;4:246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00246. eCollection 2013.
9
Syllables per second versus seconds per syllable when measuring reading speed.测量阅读速度时每秒音节数与每音节秒数的对比。
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 16;3:518. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00518. eCollection 2012.