Unità Operativa di Ematologia, Ospedale dell'Angelo AUSL 12 Venezia-Mestre-via Paccagnella, 11, 30174 Mestre-Venezia, Italy.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 10;29(32):4227-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.9799. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
The Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi HD9601 trial compared doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) versus doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechloretamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone (Stanford V [StV]) versus the combination of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone (MOPP) with epidoxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine (EBV), lomustine, doxorubicin, and vindesine (CAD) (MOPP/EBV/CAD [MEC]) for the initial treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma to select which regimen would best support a reduced radiotherapy program (limited to two or fewer sites of either previous bulky or partially remitting disease). Superiority of ABVD and MEC to StV was demonstrated. We report analysis of long-term outcome and toxicity.
Patients with stage IIB, III, or IV were randomly assigned among six cycles of ABVD, three cycles of StV, and six cycles of MEC; radiotherapy was administered in 76, 71, and 50 patients in the three arms, respectively.
Currently, the median follow-up is 86 months; in the prolonged observation period, eight additional failures, including two relapses, both in the StV arm, and six additional deaths in complete response were recorded. The 10-year overall survival rates were 87%, 80%, and 78% for ABVD, MEC, and StV, respectively (P = .4). The 10-year failure-free survival was 75%, 74%, and 49% in the ABVD, MEC, and StV arms, respectively (P < .001). The 10-year disease-free survival of patients treated or not with radiotherapy (RT) showed no difference for ABVD or MEC (85% v 80% and 93% v 68%), and a statistically significant difference for StV (76% v 33%; P = .004). No significant long-term toxicity was recorded.
The long-term analysis confirmed ABVD and MEC superiority to StV. The use of RT after StV was established as mandatory. ABVD is still to be considered as the standard treatment with a good balance between efficacy and toxicity.
意大利淋巴瘤协作组 9601 试验比较了多柔比星、博来霉素、长春碱和达卡巴嗪(ABVD)与多柔比星、长春碱、氮芥、长春新碱、博来霉素、依托泊苷和泼尼松(斯坦福 V [StV])与氮芥、长春新碱、丙卡巴肼、泼尼松(MOPP)联合表阿霉素、博来霉素、长春碱(EBV)、洛莫司汀、多柔比星和长春地辛(CAD)(MOPP/EBV/CAD [MEC])用于治疗晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的初始治疗,以选择哪种方案最能支持减少放疗方案(仅限于以前的大肿块或部分缓解疾病的两个或更少部位)。ABVD 和 MEC 优于 StV 的优势得到了证实。我们报告了长期结果和毒性分析。
IIB、III 或 IV 期患者随机分配接受 6 个周期 ABVD、3 个周期 StV 和 6 个周期 MEC;分别有 76、71 和 50 名患者在这三个臂中接受放疗。
目前,中位随访时间为 86 个月;在延长的观察期内,StV 组记录到 8 例额外失败,包括 2 例复发,6 例完全缓解后死亡。ABVD、MEC 和 StV 的 10 年总生存率分别为 87%、80%和 78%(P =.4)。ABVD、MEC 和 StV 组的 10 年无失败生存率分别为 75%、74%和 49%(P <.001)。接受或不接受放疗(RT)治疗的患者的 10 年无疾病生存率在 ABVD 或 MEC 之间无差异(85%比 80%和 93%比 68%),而在 StV 之间存在统计学显著差异(76%比 33%;P =.004)。未记录到明显的长期毒性。
长期分析证实 ABVD 和 MEC 优于 StV。StV 后使用 RT 被确定为强制性。ABVD 仍然被认为是一种标准治疗方法,在疗效和毒性之间具有良好的平衡。