Suppr超能文献

不同拉伸运动对跳跃表现的急性影响。

The acute effects of different stretching exercises on jump performance.

机构信息

International University of Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Valles, Spain.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Nov;25(11):2991-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212dac0.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the short-term effects of different stretching exercises during the warm-up period on the lower limbs. A controlled, crossover clinical study involving 49 volunteers (14 women and 35 men; mean age: 20.4 years) enrolled in a "physical and sporting activities monitor" program. The explosive force was assessed using the Bosco test. The protocol was as follows: The test involved a (pre) jump test, general warm-up, intervention and (post) jump test. Each volunteer was subjected to each of the 5 interventions (no stretching [NS] and stretching: static passive stretching [P]; proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation [PNF] techniques; static active stretching in passive tension [PT]; static active stretching in active tension [AT]) in a random order. The jump test was used to assess the squat jump, countermovement jump (CMJ), elasticity index (EI), and drop jump. An intragroup statistical analysis was performed before and after each intervention to compare the differences between the different stretching exercises. An intergroup analysis was also performed. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between all variables for the interventions "P," "PNF," and "TA" in the intragroup analysis, with each value being higher in the postjump test. Only the "P" intervention showed a significant difference (p = 0.046) for "EI," with the postvalue being lower. Likewise, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for the "CMJ" measurements during the intergroup analysis, especially between "NS" and the interventions "P," "PNF," "AT," and "PT," with each value, particularly that for "AT," being higher after stretching. The results of this study suggest that static active stretching in AT can be recommended during the warm-up for explosive force disciplines.

摘要

本研究旨在展示热身期间不同拉伸练习对下肢的短期影响。一项涉及 49 名志愿者(14 名女性和 35 名男性;平均年龄:20.4 岁)的对照、交叉临床研究,他们参加了一项“身体和运动活动监测”计划。爆发力使用 Bosco 测试进行评估。方案如下:测试包括(预)跳跃测试、一般热身、干预和(后)跳跃测试。每个志愿者都接受了 5 种干预措施(无拉伸[NS]和拉伸:静态被动拉伸[P];本体感受神经肌肉促进[PNF]技术;被动张力下的静态主动拉伸[PT];主动张力下的静态主动拉伸[AT])中的每一种,顺序随机。跳跃测试用于评估深蹲跳、反向跳(CMJ)、弹性指数(EI)和下落跳。在每个干预前后进行组内统计分析,比较不同拉伸练习之间的差异。还进行了组间分析。组内分析中,干预“P”、“PNF”和“TA”的所有变量均存在显著差异(p<0.05),后测值均高于前测值。只有“P”干预对“EI”显示出显著差异(p=0.046),后测值较低。同样,在组间分析中,“CMJ”测量值也存在显著差异(p<0.05),尤其是在“NS”与干预“P”、“PNF”、“AT”和“PT”之间,每个值,特别是“AT”的值,拉伸后更高。本研究结果表明,主动张力下的静态主动拉伸可在爆发力训练的热身期间推荐使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验