Institute of Language and Communication Sciences, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;29(Pt 4):910-28. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02019.x. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
The objective of this paper is to discuss whether children have a capacity for deontic reasoning that is irreducible to mentalizing. The results of two experiments point to the existence of such non-mentalistic understanding and prediction of the behaviour of others. In Study 1, young children (3- and 4-year-olds) were told different versions of classic false-belief tasks, some of which were modified by the introduction of a rule or a regularity. When the task (a standard change of location task) included a rule, the performance of 3-year-olds, who fail traditional false-belief tasks, significantly improved. In Study 2, 3-year-olds proved to be able to infer a rule from a social situation and to use it in order to predict the behaviour of a character involved in a modified version of the false-belief task. These studies suggest that rules play a central role in the social cognition of young children and that deontic reasoning might not necessarily involve mind reading.
本文旨在探讨儿童是否具有一种不能还原为心理理论的义务推理能力。两项实验的结果表明,儿童具有这种非心理主义的理解和预测他人行为的能力。在研究 1 中,幼儿(3 岁和 4 岁)被呈现不同版本的经典错误信念任务,其中一些任务通过引入规则或规律性进行了修改。当任务(标准的位置变化任务)包含规则时,无法通过传统错误信念任务的 3 岁儿童的表现显著提高。在研究 2 中,3 岁儿童被证明能够从社交情境中推断出规则,并将其用于预测参与修改后的错误信念任务的角色的行为。这些研究表明,规则在幼儿的社会认知中起着核心作用,而义务推理不一定涉及心理阅读。