• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于功能谱的基因列表比较。

Comparison of lists of genes based on functional profiles.

机构信息

Statistics Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Oct 16;12:401. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-401.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2105-12-401
PMID:21999355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3747174/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

How to compare studies on the basis of their biological significance is a problem of central importance in high-throughput genomics. Many methods for performing such comparisons are based on the information in databases of functional annotation, such as those that form the Gene Ontology (GO). Typically, they consist of analyzing gene annotation frequencies in some pre-specified GO classes, in a class-by-class way, followed by p-value adjustment for multiple testing. Enrichment analysis, where a list of genes is compared against a wider universe of genes, is the most common example.

RESULTS

A new global testing procedure and a method incorporating it are presented. Instead of testing separately for each GO class, a single global test for all classes under consideration is performed. The test is based on the distance between the functional profiles, defined as the joint frequencies of annotation in a given set of GO classes. These classes may be chosen at one or more GO levels. The new global test is more powerful and accurate with respect to type I errors than the usual class-by-class approach. When applied to some real datasets, the results suggest that the method may also provide useful information that complements the tests performed using a class-by-class approach if gene counts are sparse in some classes. An R library, goProfiles, implements these methods and is available from Bioconductor, http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/goProfiles.html.

CONCLUSIONS

The method provides an inferential basis for deciding whether two lists are functionally different. For global comparisons it is preferable to the global chi-square test of homogeneity. Furthermore, it may provide additional information if used in conjunction with class-by-class methods.

摘要

背景

如何根据生物学意义比较研究是高通量基因组学中的一个核心问题。许多用于执行此类比较的方法都基于功能注释数据库中的信息,例如构成基因本体论 (GO) 的数据库。通常,它们包括以类为单位,逐个分析某些预定义 GO 类中的基因注释频率,然后对多重检验进行 p 值调整。富集分析是比较基因列表与更广泛基因集合的最常见示例。

结果

提出了一种新的全局测试程序和一种包含该程序的方法。新方法不是为每个 GO 类分别进行测试,而是对所有考虑的类进行单一的全局测试。该测试基于功能谱之间的距离,功能谱定义为在给定的 GO 类集合中注释的联合频率。这些类可以在一个或多个 GO 级别上选择。与通常的类为单位的方法相比,新的全局测试在控制第一类错误方面更强大和准确。当应用于一些真实数据集时,结果表明,如果某些类中的基因计数稀疏,该方法还可以提供有用的信息,补充类为单位的方法进行的测试。R 库 goProfiles 实现了这些方法,并可从 Bioconductor 获得,网址为 http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/goProfiles.html。

结论

该方法为判断两个列表是否在功能上不同提供了推理基础。对于全局比较,它优于全局同质性卡方检验。此外,如果与类为单位的方法结合使用,它可能会提供额外的信息。

相似文献

1
Comparison of lists of genes based on functional profiles.基于功能谱的基因列表比较。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Oct 16;12:401. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-401.
2
CompGO: an R package for comparing and visualizing Gene Ontology enrichment differences between DNA binding experiments.CompGO:一个用于比较和可视化DNA结合实验之间基因本体富集差异的R包。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Sep 2;16:275. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0701-2.
3
Generation of Gene Ontology benchmark datasets with various types of positive signal.生成具有各种类型正信号的基因本体论基准数据集。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Oct 7;10:319. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-319.
4
GOsummaries: an R Package for Visual Functional Annotation of Experimental Data.GO摘要:一个用于实验数据可视化功能注释的R包。
F1000Res. 2015 Aug 18;4:574. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6925.1. eCollection 2015.
5
GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists.GOrilla:一种用于在排序后的基因列表中发现和可视化富集的基因本体(GO)术语的工具。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 3;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-48.
6
An equivalence approach to the integrative analysis of feature lists.特征列表综合分析的等价方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Aug 27;20(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3008-x.
7
Comparative analysis of gene sets in the Gene Ontology space under the multiple hypothesis testing framework.在多重假设检验框架下对基因本体空间中基因集的比较分析。
Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf. 2004:425-35. doi: 10.1109/csb.2004.1332455.
8
GS2: an efficiently computable measure of GO-based similarity of gene sets.GS2:一种基于基因本体论的基因集相似性的高效可计算度量。
Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1178-84. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp128. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
9
RamiGO: an R/Bioconductor package providing an AmiGO visualize interface.RamiGO:一个提供 AmiGO 可视化界面的 R/Bioconductor 包。
Bioinformatics. 2013 Mar 1;29(5):666-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts708. Epub 2013 Jan 6.
10
GOSemSim: an R package for measuring semantic similarity among GO terms and gene products.GO 语义相似度分析:用于测量 GO 术语和基因产物之间语义相似性的 R 包。
Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 1;26(7):976-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq064. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
An equivalence test between features lists, based on the Sorensen-Dice index and the joint frequencies of GO term enrichment.基于 Sorensen-Dice 指数和 GO 术语富集的共同频率对特征列表进行等效性检验。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 May 31;23(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04739-2.
2
A Review of Cancer Genetics and Genomics Studies in Africa.非洲癌症遗传学与基因组学研究综述
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 15;10:606400. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.606400. eCollection 2020.
3
An equivalence approach to the integrative analysis of feature lists.

本文引用的文献

1
Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists.生物信息学富集工具:通向大型基因列表全面功能分析的途径
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn923. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
2
SerbGO: searching for the best GO tool.SerbGO:寻找最佳的基因本体(GO)工具。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W368-71. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn256. Epub 2008 May 14.
3
A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion.
特征列表综合分析的等价方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Aug 27;20(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3008-x.
4
Opposite T Response of ACTG1-FOS Subnetwork Differentiate Tailfin Fate in Xenopus Tadpole and Post-hatching Axolotl.ACTG1-FOS 子网的相反 T 反应区分非洲爪蟾蝌蚪和孵化后美西螈的尾鳍命运。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Apr 2;10:194. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00194. eCollection 2019.
5
Reduced changes in protein compared to mRNA levels across non-proliferating tissues.与非增殖组织中mRNA水平相比,蛋白质变化减少。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Apr 18;18(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3683-9.
6
A potential prognostic lncRNA signature for predicting survival in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma.一种用于预测膀胱尿路上皮癌患者生存情况的潜在预后lncRNA特征。
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 7;8(6):10485-10497. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14441.
7
Meta-analysis and meta-regression of transcriptomic responses to water stress in Arabidopsis.拟南芥对水分胁迫转录组反应的荟萃分析和荟萃回归
Plant J. 2016 Feb;85(4):548-60. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13124.
8
TRIM37 is a new histone H2A ubiquitin ligase and breast cancer oncoprotein.TRIM37是一种新型组蛋白H2A泛素连接酶和乳腺癌癌蛋白。
Nature. 2014 Dec 4;516(7529):116-20. doi: 10.1038/nature13955. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
现代多重假设检验综述,特别关注错误发现率。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Aug;17(4):347-88. doi: 10.1177/0962280206079046. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
4
Review of the literature examining the correlation among DNA microarray technologies.对研究DNA微阵列技术之间相关性的文献综述。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2007 Jun;48(5):380-94. doi: 10.1002/em.20290.
5
Enrichment analysis in high-throughput genomics - accounting for dependency in the NULL.高通量基因组学中的富集分析——考虑空值中的依赖性。
Brief Bioinform. 2007 Mar;8(2):71-7. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbl019. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
6
Genome comparison using Gene Ontology (GO) with statistical testing.使用基因本体论(GO)并进行统计检验的基因组比较。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 11;7:374. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-374.
7
Group testing for pathway analysis improves comparability of different microarray datasets.用于通路分析的分组检验可提高不同微阵列数据集的可比性。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Oct 15;22(20):2500-6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl424. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
8
Highly consistent patterns for inherited human diseases at the molecular level.人类遗传性疾病在分子水平上具有高度一致的模式。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 1;22(3):269-77. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti781. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
9
Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.基因集富集分析:一种基于知识的方法用于解读全基因组表达谱。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
10
A comparison of the aging and apoptotic transcriptome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.酿酒酵母衰老与凋亡转录组的比较
FEMS Yeast Res. 2005 Dec;5(12):1261-72. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.07.006. Epub 2005 Aug 31.