Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.083. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
The fact that action observation, motor imagery and execution are associated with partially overlapping increases in parieto-frontal areas has been interpreted as evidence for reliance of these behaviors on a common system of motor representations. However, studies that include all three conditions within a single paradigm are rare, and consequently, there is a dearth of knowledge concerning the distinct mechanisms involved in these functions. Here we report key differences in neural representations subserving observation, imagery, and synchronous imitation of a repetitive bimanual finger-tapping task using fMRI under conditions in which visual stimulation is carefully controlled. Relative to rest, observation, imagery, and synchronous imitation are all associated with widespread increases in cortical activity. Importantly, when effects of visual stimulation are properly controlled, each of these conditions is found to have its own unique neural signature. Relative to observation or imagery, synchronous imitation shows increased bilateral activity along the central sulcus (extending into precentral and postcentral gyri), in the cerebellum, supplementary motor area (SMA), parietal operculum, and several motor-related subcortical areas. No areas show greater increases for imagery vs. synchronous imitation; however, relative to synchronous imitation, observation is associated with greater increases in caudal SMA activity than synchronous imitation. Compared to observation, imagery increases activation in pre-SMA and left inferior frontal cortex, while no areas show the inverse effect. Region-of-interest (ROI) analyses reveal that areas involved in bimanual open-loop movements respond most to synchronous imitation (primary sensorimotor, classic SMA, and cerebellum), and less vigorously to imagery and observation. The differential activity between conditions suggests an alternative hierarchical model in which these behaviors all rely on partially independent mechanisms.
动作观察、运动意象和执行与顶-额区域的部分重叠增加有关,这一事实被解释为这些行为依赖于共同的运动表现系统的证据。然而,在单一范式中包含所有三种条件的研究很少,因此,关于这些功能涉及的不同机制的知识也很少。在这里,我们使用 fMRI 报告了在仔细控制视觉刺激的条件下,观察、想象和同步模仿重复双手手指敲击任务时,支持观察、想象和同步模仿的神经表现的关键差异。与休息相比,观察、想象和同步模仿都与皮质活动的广泛增加有关。重要的是,当正确控制视觉刺激的影响时,发现这些条件中的每一个都有其独特的神经特征。与观察或想象相比,同步模仿显示双侧活动增加,沿中央沟(延伸到中央前回和中央后回)、小脑、补充运动区(SMA)、顶叶盖和几个与运动相关的皮质下区域。没有任何区域显示出比想象更强烈的增加;然而,与同步模仿相比,观察与 SMA 尾部活动的增加比同步模仿更大。与观察相比,想象增加了前 SMA 和左侧额下回的激活,而没有任何区域显示出相反的效果。感兴趣区域(ROI)分析表明,涉及双手开环运动的区域对同步模仿的反应最强烈(初级感觉运动、经典 SMA 和小脑),对想象和观察的反应较弱。条件之间的差异活动表明了一种替代的层次模型,其中这些行为都依赖于部分独立的机制。