CHU de l'Archet, Nice, France.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 May;18(5):788-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation remains the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The impact of rituximab combined with chemotherapy in either first- or second-line therapy on the ultimate results of ASCT remains to be determined, however. This study was designed to evaluate the benefit of ASCT in patients achieving a second complete remission after salvage chemotherapy by retrospectively comparing the disease-free survival (DFS) after ASCT for each patient with the duration of the first complete remission (CR1). Between 1990 and 2005, a total of 470 patients who had undergone ASCT and reported to the European Blood and Bone Transplantation Registry with Medical Essential Data Form B information were evaluated. Of these 470 patients, 351 (74%) had not received rituximab before ASCT, and 119 (25%) had received rituximab before ASCT. The median duration of CR1 was 11 months. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 24 months. The BEAM protocol was the most frequently used conditioning regimen (67%). After ASCT, the 5-year overall survival was 63% (95% confidence interval, 58%-67%) and 5-year DFS was 48% (95% confidence interval, 43%-53%) for the entire patient population. Statistical analysis showed a significant increase in DFS after ASCT compared with duration of CR1 (median, 51 months versus 11 months; P < .001). This difference was also highly significant for patients with previous exposure to rituximab (median, 10 months versus not reached; P < .001) and for patients who had experienced relapse before 1 year (median, 6 months versus 47 months; P < .001). Our data indicate that ASCT can significantly increase DFS compared with the duration of CR1 in relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma and can alter the disease course even in patients with high-risk disease previously treated with rituximab.
自体干细胞移植(ASCT)巩固治疗仍然是复发性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的首选治疗方法。然而,利妥昔单抗联合化疗在一线或二线治疗中的应用对 ASCT 最终结果的影响仍有待确定。本研究旨在通过回顾性比较每位患者接受挽救性化疗后达到第二次完全缓解(CR2)后的 ASCT 无病生存(DFS)与第一次 CR1 的持续时间,评估 ASCT 在患者中的获益。在 1990 年至 2005 年期间,共有 470 名接受 ASCT 并向欧洲血液和骨髓移植登记处报告了医疗基本数据表格 B 信息的患者接受了评估。在这 470 名患者中,351 名(74%)在 ASCT 前未接受利妥昔单抗治疗,119 名(25%)在 ASCT 前接受了利妥昔单抗治疗。CR1 的中位持续时间为 11 个月。从诊断到 ASCT 的中位时间为 24 个月。BEAM 方案是最常使用的预处理方案(67%)。ASCT 后,整个患者群体的 5 年总生存率为 63%(95%置信区间,58%-67%),5 年 DFS 为 48%(95%置信区间,43%-53%)。统计分析显示,与 CR1 持续时间相比,ASCT 后 DFS 显著增加(中位数,51 个月比 11 个月;P<.001)。对于以前暴露于利妥昔单抗的患者(中位数,10 个月比未达到;P<.001)和在 1 年内复发的患者(中位数,6 个月比 47 个月;P<.001),这种差异也具有高度显著性。我们的数据表明,与复发性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的 CR1 持续时间相比,ASCT 可以显著提高 DFS,并可改变疾病进程,即使在以前用利妥昔单抗治疗的高危疾病患者中也是如此。
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2005-12
Mol Cancer. 2022-10-19