Fletcher-Johnston M, Marshall S K, Straatman L
School of Social Work, University of British Columbia, Centre for Community Child Health Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Child Care Health Dev. 2011 Nov;37(6):875-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01318.x.
Research has only begun to examine the complexity of transition to adulthood under illness conditions. A Delphi method may be utilized to identify pertinent research priorities for academics and clinicians in adolescent healthcare transitions and prioritize a framework for an ongoing programme of research.
Through a comprehensive recruitment strategy throughout Canada, 114 clinicians and academics were invited to participate in this national study. Three phases were conducted until consensus could be achieved for the five most pressing research priorities.
Thirty-eight respondents completed at least one of the three phases of the process. All responses were analysed, and five questions in phase 3 achieving a level of consensus ranging 64-80% were identified as the top five research priorities. These questions included: skills and knowledge adolescents require for the transition process, how to measure success, the factors that influence a successful transition and whether good transitions improve health outcomes.
The results of this study can inform and prioritize a framework for an ongoing programme of research in Canada. The inclusion of clinicians and academics ensures that the research agenda incorporates perspectives from the front-line work of individuals providing care to this population as well as individuals from the academic community with important knowledge and skills related to research approaches and methods.
关于疾病状况下向成年期过渡的复杂性研究才刚刚起步。德尔菲法可用于确定青少年医疗保健过渡方面学者和临床医生相关的研究重点,并为正在进行的研究项目确定一个框架的优先级。
通过在加拿大各地全面的招募策略,邀请了114名临床医生和学者参与这项全国性研究。进行了三个阶段,直到就五个最紧迫的研究重点达成共识。
38名受访者完成了该过程的至少一个阶段。对所有回复进行了分析,第三阶段中五个达成64%-80%共识水平的问题被确定为前五大研究重点。这些问题包括:青少年过渡过程所需的技能和知识、如何衡量成功、影响成功过渡的因素以及良好的过渡是否能改善健康结果。
本研究结果可为加拿大正在进行的研究项目框架提供参考并确定其优先级。纳入临床医生和学者可确保研究议程纳入为该人群提供护理的一线工作人员以及来自学术界、拥有与研究方法和手段相关重要知识和技能的人员的观点。