• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录中的电子处方可减少门诊处方错误。

Electronic prescribing within an electronic health record reduces ambulatory prescribing errors.

作者信息

Abramson Erika L, Barrón Yolanda, Quaresimo Jill, Kaushal Rainu

机构信息

Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Oct;37(10):470-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37060-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37060-2
PMID:22013821
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health policy forces are promoting the adoption of interoperable electronic health records (EHRs) with electronic prescribing (e-prescribing). Despite the promise of EHRs with e-prescribing to improve medication safety in ambulatory care settings--where most prescribing occurs and where errors are common--few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness. A study was conducted to assess the effect of an e-prescribing system with clinical decision support, including checks for drug allergies and drug-drug interactions, that was integrated within an EHR on rates of ambulatory prescribing errors.

METHODS

In a prospective study using a nonrandomized, pre-post design with concurrent controls, 6 providers who used a commercial e-prescribing system were compared with 15 providers who remained paper-based from September 2005 through July 2008. Prescribing errors were identified by a standardized prescription and chart review.

RESULTS

Some 2,432 paper prescriptions at baseline and 2,079 prescriptions at one year were analyzed. Error rates for e-prescribing adopters decreased 1.5-fold--from 26.0 errors per 100 prescriptions at baseline (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.4-38.9) to 16.0 errors per 100 prescriptions at one year (95% CI, 12.7-20.2; p = .09). Error rates remained unchanged for nonadopters (37.3 per 100 prescriptions at baseline, 95% CI, 27.6-50.2, versus 38.4 per 100 prescriptions at one year, 95% CI 27.4-53.9; p = .54). Error rates for e-prescribing adopters were significantly lower than for nonadopters at one year (p < .001). Illegibility errors were high at baseline and eliminated by e-prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary findings from this small group of providers suggest that e-prescribing systems may decrease ambulatory prescribing errors, which are occurring at high rates among community-based providers.

摘要

背景

卫生政策力量正在推动采用具有电子处方功能的可互操作电子健康记录(EHR)。尽管具有电子处方功能的EHR有望改善门诊护理环境中的用药安全——大多数处方开具于此且错误常见——但很少有研究证明其有效性。开展了一项研究,以评估整合于EHR中的具有临床决策支持功能(包括药物过敏和药物相互作用检查)的电子处方系统对门诊处方错误率的影响。

方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,采用非随机、前后对照设计并设置同期对照,将6名使用商业电子处方系统的医疗服务提供者与2005年9月至2008年7月期间仍采用纸质处方的15名医疗服务提供者进行比较。通过标准化处方和病历审查来识别处方错误。

结果

共分析了基线时约2432份纸质处方和一年时的2079份处方。采用电子处方者的错误率降低了1.5倍——从基线时每100份处方26.0个错误(95%置信区间[CI],17.4 - 38.9)降至一年时每100份处方16.0个错误(95%CI,12.7 - 20.2;p = 0.09)。未采用电子处方者(基线时每100份处方37.3个错误,95%CI,27.6 - 50.2,一年时每100份处方38.4个错误,95%CI 27.4 - 53.9;p = 0.54)的错误率保持不变。一年时,采用电子处方者的错误率显著低于未采用者(p < 0.001)。基线时字迹模糊错误率较高,电子处方消除了此类错误。

结论

这一小群医疗服务提供者的初步研究结果表明,电子处方系统可能会降低门诊处方错误率,而社区医疗服务提供者中的此类错误发生率较高。

相似文献

1
Electronic prescribing within an electronic health record reduces ambulatory prescribing errors.电子健康记录中的电子处方可减少门诊处方错误。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Oct;37(10):470-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37060-2.
2
Electronic prescribing improves medication safety in community-based office practices.电子处方可提高社区门诊的用药安全性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1238-8. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
3
The comparative effectiveness of 2 electronic prescribing systems.两种电子处方系统的比较效果。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Dec;17(12 Spec No.):SP88-94.
4
The effects of electronic prescribing by community-based providers on ambulatory medication safety.社区医疗服务提供者进行电子处方开具对门诊用药安全的影响。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Dec;39(12):545-52. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39070-9.
5
Transitioning between electronic health records: effects on ambulatory prescribing safety.电子病历系统切换:对门诊处方安全的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug;26(8):868-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1703-z. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
6
A long-term follow-up evaluation of electronic health record prescribing safety.电子健康记录处方安全性的长期随访评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e52-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001328. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
7
Effects of two commercial electronic prescribing systems on prescribing error rates in hospital in-patients: a before and after study.两种商业电子医嘱系统对医院住院患者医嘱错误率的影响:一项前后对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2012 Jan;9(1):e1001164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001164. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
8
Ambulatory prescribing errors among community-based providers in two states.两州社区医疗机构中门诊用药差错情况
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):644-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000345. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
9
Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: a focus group study.评估门诊医疗中电子处方的价值:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Sep;78(9):571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
10
Quality and Variability of Patient Directions in Electronic Prescriptions in the Ambulatory Care Setting.在门诊环境中,电子处方中患者指导的质量和变异性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):691-699. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17404. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Medication Management Technologies in Swiss Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.瑞士初级医疗中药物管理技术的应用:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 27;27:e68857. doi: 10.2196/68857.
2
How intervention studies measure the effectiveness of medication safety-related clinical decision support systems in primary and long-term care: a systematic review.干预研究如何衡量药物安全相关临床决策支持系统在初级保健和长期护理中的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jul 4;24(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02596-y.
3
E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review.
社区环境中的电子处方与用药安全:一项快速综述。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Nov 7;12:100365. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100365. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Pancreatic cancer is associated with medication changes prior to clinical diagnosis.胰腺癌与临床诊断前的药物变化有关。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 28;14(1):2437. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38088-2.
5
The Effects of the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record Portals on Cancer Survivors' Health Outcomes: Cross-sectional Survey Study.患者可访问的电子健康记录门户的使用对癌症幸存者健康结果的影响:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 24;24(10):e39614. doi: 10.2196/39614.
6
Developing a Multifaceted Evaluation Tool for Electronic Prescribing System: A Study from a Developing Country.为电子处方系统开发多维度评估工具:来自一个发展中国家的研究
Iran J Pharm Res. 2022 Feb 8;21(1):e123821. doi: 10.5812/ijpr.123821. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Ambulatory Medication Safety in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.初级医疗中的门诊用药安全:系统评价。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 May-Jun;35(3):610-628. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210334.
8
[Electronic medical record and prescription: risks and benefits detected since its implementation. Safe designing, rollout and use].[电子病历与处方:实施以来发现的风险与益处。安全设计、推广与使用]
Aten Primaria. 2021 Dec;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):102220. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102220.
9
Effect of Electronic Prescribing Compared to Paper-Based (Handwritten) Prescribing on Primary Medication Adherence in an Outpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.电子处方与纸质(手写)处方相比对门诊患者主要药物依从性的影响:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):845-855. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735182. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
Prevalence and Sources of Errors in Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Provisioning.正压通气治疗配置中的错误发生率和来源。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 May 15;15(5):697-704. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7752.