German Breast Group, Neu-Isenhurg & Senologic Oncology, Luisenkrankenhaus Diisseldorf, Isenburg, Germany.
Breast. 2011 Oct;20 Suppl 3:S142-5. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(11)70312-5.
AIMS: To review the recent literature on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer with respect to insights that might be used for better using systemic treatment in early breast cancer. RESULTS: Much more insight was gained during recent years on how to use information on pathologic complete response (pCR). pCR appears to be a valid surrogate for long-term survival mainly in triple-negative and HER2-positive disease. Patient with breast cancer of these subtypes can be relieved from poor prognosis if they achieve a pCR after neoadjuvant treatment. It can even be speculated that the extent of local and post-surgical systemic treatment can be further reduced. Patients without pCR show a high risk of early recurrence and are at high need for new treatment options. These advantages lead to the recommendation that use of neoadjuvant treatment should not be indicated by tumor size but far more by tumor subtype. As pCR appears to be more sensitive to detect treatment effects than disease-free survival, the neoadjuvant approach identifies easier promising treatments and can even discriminate optimal approaches for biologically defined subgroups. A recent meta-analysis examining pattern of neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggests that luminal-B type tumors require longer duration of treatment, triple-negative tumors require dose-intensified anthracycline-taxane-based treatment of only short duration, and HER2-positive tumors require longer duration (if hormone-receptor positive) and an optimal dose of taxanes. As biomarkers can be easily assessed on tumor tissue before, during, and after treatment, there is increasing data available on markers that e.g. potentially predict resistance to anti-HER2 treatment, predict response to anti-angiogenic drugs as well as efficacy of PARP inhibitors. Validation of these candidate markers remains a challenging task, as patients cohort are usually small and finding studies are compromised by multiple testing. CONCLUSION: With the acquired new knowledge from neoadjuvant studies will help to individualize treatment based on biological behavior of breast cancer subtypes.
目的:回顾近年来乳腺癌新辅助治疗的文献,以期为早期乳腺癌的系统治疗提供更好的见解。
结果:近年来,人们对如何利用病理完全缓解(pCR)的信息有了更多的了解。pCR 似乎是长期生存的有效替代指标,主要在三阴性和 HER2 阳性疾病中。如果这些亚型的乳腺癌患者在新辅助治疗后达到 pCR,可以减轻不良预后。甚至可以推测,局部和术后全身性治疗的程度可以进一步降低。没有 pCR 的患者复发风险高,需要新的治疗选择。这些优势导致建议新辅助治疗的使用不应根据肿瘤大小,而应更多地根据肿瘤亚型。由于 pCR 似乎比无病生存期更能敏感地检测治疗效果,因此新辅助方法更容易发现有前途的治疗方法,甚至可以区分针对生物学定义亚组的最佳方法。最近一项检查新辅助化疗模式的荟萃分析表明,luminal-B 型肿瘤需要更长的治疗时间,三阴性肿瘤需要短时间内强化蒽环类药物-紫杉类药物治疗,HER2 阳性肿瘤需要更长的时间(如果激素受体阳性)和最佳剂量的紫杉类药物。由于生物标志物可以在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后很容易地在肿瘤组织上进行评估,因此越来越多的数据可用于预测抗 HER2 治疗耐药性、预测抗血管生成药物反应以及 PARP 抑制剂疗效的标志物。验证这些候选标志物仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务,因为患者队列通常较小,并且发现研究受到多次测试的影响。
结论:通过新辅助研究获得的新知识将有助于根据乳腺癌亚型的生物学行为进行个体化治疗。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012-11-27
Clin Cancer Res. 2007-4-15
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011-4-7
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023-6-2
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018-11-1
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014-4-28
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2013-7-9
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013-3-12
Mol Biol Rep. 2012-2-9