• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桡骨远端关节内骨折掌侧锁定钢板固定的生物力学比较:远端固定使用4枚螺钉与7枚螺钉的情况

A biomechanical comparison of volar locked plating of intra-articular distal radius fractures: use of 4 versus 7 screws for distal fixation.

作者信息

Moss David P, Means Kenneth R, Parks Brent G, Forthman Christopher L

机构信息

Curtis National Hand Center, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Dec;36(12):1907-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.08.039. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.08.039
PMID:22018475
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether the number of distal locking screws significantly affects stability of a cadaveric simulated distal radius fracture fixed with a volar locking plate.

METHODS

We created AO/ASIF type C2 fractures in 10 matched pairs of human fresh-frozen cadaveric wrists and then fixed them using volar locking plates. The number of distal locking screws used was 4 screws or 7 screws in each wrist of the matched pair. We loaded the stabilized fractures cyclically to simulate 6 weeks of postoperative stressing during a therapy protocol and then loaded them to failure. Failure was defined as 2 mm or more of displacement of any fracture fragment as recorded by differential variable reluctance transducers.

RESULTS

No wrists failed during the cyclic loading portion for either the 4- or 7-screw construct. The average initial stiffness of the 7-screw construct was 69 N/mm (± 38) versus 48 N/mm (± 14) for the 4-screw construct. The average failure load for the 7-screw construct was 139 N (± 78) versus 108 N (± 18) for the 4-screw construct. Neither of these differences was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was a trend toward increased initial stiffness and higher failure load in fractures fixed distally with 7 locking screws, the results were not statistically significant compared with fractures fixed with only 4 screws. Both constructs can withstand forces likely encountered in early therapy protocols.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of extra distal locking screws when fixing distal radius fractures increases expense and may increase the risk of complications, such as extensor tendon irritation or rupture.

摘要

目的

确定远端锁定螺钉的数量是否会显著影响用掌侧锁定钢板固定的尸体模拟桡骨远端骨折的稳定性。

方法

我们在10对匹配的人类新鲜冷冻尸体手腕上制造了AO/ASIF C2型骨折,然后用掌侧锁定钢板进行固定。在匹配对的每只手腕中,使用的远端锁定螺钉数量为4枚或7枚。我们对稳定的骨折进行循环加载,以模拟治疗方案中术后6周的应力,然后加载至骨折失效。失效定义为差分可变磁阻传感器记录的任何骨折碎片移位2毫米或更多。

结果

对于4枚螺钉或7枚螺钉的固定结构,在循环加载部分均没有手腕发生失效。7枚螺钉固定结构的平均初始刚度为69 N/mm(±38),而4枚螺钉固定结构为48 N/mm(±14)。7枚螺钉固定结构的平均失效载荷为139 N(±78),而4枚螺钉固定结构为108 N(±18)。这些差异均无统计学意义。

结论

尽管用7枚锁定螺钉进行远端固定的骨折在初始刚度和失效载荷方面有增加的趋势,但与仅用4枚螺钉固定的骨折相比,结果无统计学意义。两种固定结构都能承受早期治疗方案中可能遇到的力。

临床意义

在固定桡骨远端骨折时使用额外的远端锁定螺钉会增加费用,并可能增加并发症的风险,如伸肌腱刺激或断裂。

相似文献

1
A biomechanical comparison of volar locked plating of intra-articular distal radius fractures: use of 4 versus 7 screws for distal fixation.桡骨远端关节内骨折掌侧锁定钢板固定的生物力学比较:远端固定使用4枚螺钉与7枚螺钉的情况
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Dec;36(12):1907-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.08.039. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
2
Number and locations of screw fixation for volar fixed-angle plating of distal radius fractures: biomechanical study.桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板螺钉固定的数量及位置:生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jun;35(6):885-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.027.
3
Volar plating of AO C3 distal radius fractures: biomechanical evaluation of locking screw and locking smooth peg configurations.AO C3型桡骨远端骨折的掌侧钢板固定:锁定螺钉与锁定光滑栓构型的生物力学评估
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(6):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.006.
4
Biomechanical comparison of fixed-angle volar plate versus fixed-angle volar plate plus fragment-specific fixation in a cadaveric distal radius fracture model.尸体桡骨远端骨折模型中固定角度掌侧钢板与固定角度掌侧钢板加骨折块特异性固定的生物力学比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Feb;32(2):194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.12.003.
5
Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.锁定与非锁定T型钢板用于背侧粉碎性桡骨远端骨折的掌侧和背侧固定:一项生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jul;30(4):756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.04.017.
6
A biomechanic comparison of an internal radiocarpal-spanning 2.4-mm locking plate and external fixation in a model of distal radius fractures.在桡骨远端骨折模型中对一种跨越腕关节内部的2.4毫米锁定钢板与外固定进行生物力学比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Dec;31(10):1578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.09.014.
7
Does a volar locking plate provide equivalent stability as a dorsal nonlocking plate in a dorsally comminuted distal radius fracture?: a biomechanical study.在桡骨远端背侧粉碎性骨折中,掌侧锁定钢板与背侧非锁定钢板的稳定性是否相当?一项生物力学研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Oct;22(9):605-10. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318186006f.
8
Volar fixed-angle plating of distal radius extension fractures: influence of plate position on secondary loss of reduction--a biomechanic study in a cadaveric model.桡骨远端伸展型骨折的掌侧角稳定钢板固定:钢板位置对复位二次丢失的影响——一项尸体模型生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Apr;31(4):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.01.011.
9
Volar fixed-angle plating of distal radius fractures: screws versus pegs--a biomechanical study in a cadaveric model.掌侧固定角桡骨远端骨折内固定:螺钉与钢针的比较——尸体模型生物力学研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jul;26(7):395-401. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318225ea46.
10
Volar versus dorsal locking plates with and without radial styloid locking plates for the fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: A biomechanical study in cadavers.用于固定桡骨远端背侧粉碎性骨折的掌侧与背侧锁定钢板及有无桡骨茎突锁定钢板的生物力学研究:一项尸体生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Dec;31(10):1587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.09.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of screw pull-out from plate fixation of en bloc distal radius resection with ulnar reconstruction: Finite element analysis and comparison with experiments on Thiel cadavers.评估尺骨重建的整块桡骨远端切除术钢板固定中螺钉的拔出力:有限元分析及与蒂尔尸体实验的比较
APL Bioeng. 2025 Jun 11;9(2):026123. doi: 10.1063/5.0248553. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Reduction Loss Despite Adequate Volar Locking Plate Fixation in Distal Radius Fractures: Analysis of Characteristics and Follow-up Management.桡骨远端骨折中尽管掌侧锁定钢板固定充分但仍出现复位丢失:特征分析及随访处理
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(3):478-487. doi: 10.4055/cios24197. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
3
Generic Volar Locking Plate Use in Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes and Cost Reduction.
通用掌侧锁定钢板在桡骨远端骨折中的应用:一项评估临床疗效和成本降低的前瞻性随机研究。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Nov 6:15589447241293168. doi: 10.1177/15589447241293168.
4
Short arm splints for wrist stabilization: A mechanical material test and cadaveric radiography study.用于手腕稳定的短臂夹板:一项机械材料测试和尸体放射摄影研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 26;11(4):e70065. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70065. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Utility of Ultrasound for Identifying Median Nerve Changes Indicative of Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture.超声在识别桡骨远端骨折后提示急性腕管综合征的正中神经变化中的应用
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Apr 21;5(4):430-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.03.013. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Implant cost variation in surgically treated distal radius fractures.手术治疗桡骨远端骨折的植入物成本差异
J Orthop. 2023 Apr 7;39:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.04.003. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Extensor Tendon Injury After Volar Locking Plating for Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review.掌侧锁定钢板治疗桡骨远端骨折后伸肌腱损伤:系统评价。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Dec;17(1_suppl):87S-94S. doi: 10.1177/15589447211068186. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
The Comparison of Biomechanical Volar and Dorsal Plating in Distal Part Radius Fractures; a Finite Element Analysis Study.桡骨远端骨折掌侧与背侧钢板固定的生物力学比较:一项有限元分析研究
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2021 Jan;9(1):9-14. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2020.86681.
9
Early loss of fixation after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: Does the number of screws matter?桡骨远端骨折手术治疗后早期固定失败:螺钉数量重要吗?
J Orthop. 2020 Nov 4;22:539-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.11.007. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
10
How Many Screws Are Needed for Reliable Stability of Extra-articular Nonosteoporotic Distal Radius Fractures Fixed with Volar Locking Plates?掌侧锁定钢板固定非骨质疏松性关节外桡骨远端骨折需要多少颗螺钉才能获得可靠的稳定性?
Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Mar;12(1):22-28. doi: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.22. Epub 2020 Feb 13.