Abouaf L, Panouillères M, Thobois S, Majerova V, Vighetto A, Pélisson D, Tilikete C
Inserm U1028, CNRS UMR5292, équipe Impact, centre de recherche en neurosciences de Lyon, 95, boulevard Pinel, 69500 Bron, France.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012 Apr;35(4):242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
Voluntary or reactive saccades predominate in rapid eye movements. Their goal is to preserve an active and optimal visual perception of the environment. Saccades cannot be guided once launched. Oculomotor plasticity, or saccadic adaptation, is still partially unknown, in particular the role played by the basal ganglia. New neuro-ophthalmological rehabilitation techniques require understanding the neurophysiological basis and demonstrating the neuronal structures involved in this plasticity.
This study assessed the reactive saccade adaptation in patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease, as a model of basal ganglia dysfunction. We predicted that saccadic adaptation would be preserved in this pathology.
Five patients with mild idiopathic hemi-Parkinson disease were included, as well as four age-matched controls. Reactive saccade adaptation was studied using the double-step target paradigm, in patients with OFF-Dopa treatment and in controls.
Group analysis demonstrated that patients had a lower level of adaptation than the controls (p<0.05). Individually, two patients did not adapt for bilateral saccades and one for ipsilateral (compared to Parkinson motor clinical syndrome) saccades. Two additional patients adapted on both sides but with a deficit in contralateral saccades when compared to the control group.
These preliminary results suggest basal ganglia involvement in reactive saccadic adaptation, which remains to be clarified.
在快速眼动中,自主性或反射性扫视占主导。其目的是维持对环境的积极且最佳的视觉感知。扫视一旦启动就无法被引导。眼球运动可塑性,即扫视适应性,目前仍部分未知,尤其是基底神经节所起的作用。新的神经眼科康复技术需要了解神经生理基础并证明参与这种可塑性的神经元结构。
本研究评估特发性帕金森病患者的反射性扫视适应性,以此作为基底神经节功能障碍的模型。我们预测这种病理状态下扫视适应性将得以保留。
纳入五例轻度特发性偏侧帕金森病患者以及四名年龄匹配的对照者。在未服用多巴治疗的患者和对照者中,使用双步目标范式研究反射性扫视适应性。
组间分析表明患者的适应性水平低于对照者(p<0.05)。个体分析显示,两名患者双侧扫视未出现适应性变化,一名患者同侧(与帕金森运动临床综合征相关)扫视未出现适应性变化。另外两名患者双侧均出现适应性变化,但与对照组相比,对侧扫视存在缺陷。
这些初步结果表明基底神经节参与反射性扫视适应性,这一点仍有待阐明。