Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1915-23. doi: 10.1037/a0025976. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
In whole report, a sentence presented sequentially at the rate of about 10 words/s can be recalled accurately, whereas if the task is to report only two target words (e.g., red words), the second target suffers an attentional blink if it appears shortly after the first target. If these two tasks are carried out simultaneously, is there an attentional blink, and does it affect both tasks? Here, sentence report was combined with report of two target words (Experiments 1 and 2) or two inserted target digits, Arabic numerals or word digits (Experiments 3 and 4). When participants reported only the targets an attentional blink was always observed. When they reported both the sentence and targets, sentence report was quite accurate but there was an attentional blink in picking out the targets when they were part of the sentence. When targets were extra digits inserted in the sentence there was no blink when viewers also reported the sentence. These results challenge some theories of the attentional blink: Blinks result from online selection, not perception or memory.
在整个报告中,以大约 10 个单词/秒的速度依次呈现的句子可以被准确回忆起来,而如果任务是只报告两个目标词(例如,红色的词),那么如果第二个目标词在第一个目标词之后很快出现,它就会受到注意瞬脱的影响。如果同时进行这两个任务,是否会出现注意瞬脱,并且它会影响这两个任务吗?在这里,句子报告与报告两个目标词(实验 1 和 2)或两个插入的目标数字、阿拉伯数字或单词数字(实验 3 和 4)相结合。当参与者只报告目标词时,总是会出现注意瞬脱。当他们同时报告句子和目标词时,句子报告非常准确,但当目标词是句子的一部分时,就会出现注意瞬脱。当目标词是插入句子中的额外数字时,当观众也报告句子时,就不会出现瞬脱。这些结果挑战了一些注意瞬脱理论:瞬脱是由在线选择引起的,而不是感知或记忆引起的。