Suppr超能文献

钝器打击所致颈椎损伤的发生率和类型:关键不在于受伤方式,而在于坠落方式。

Incidence and pattern of cervical spine injury in blunt assault: it is not how they are hit, but how they fall.

机构信息

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85727, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jan;72(1):271-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318238b7ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The injury mechanism of blunt cervical spine injury (CSI) involves two forces: (1) an acceleration-deceleration force or change in velocity (delta v) that causes significant head and neck movement, resulting in flexion-extension injury pattern and (2) a direct force to the head or face against an immovable object with force transmitted down the cervical spine. Combining those two forces creates what bioengineers call imparted energy (IE). In blunt assault to the head or face, IE is low; hence, the reported incidence of CSI is low. The goal of our study was to identify the incidence, pattern, and outcome of CSI in blunt assaulted patients.

METHOD

We queried the trauma registry at our Level I trauma center for patients admitted with the diagnosis of blunt assault over a 5-year period (2005-2009). Patients with CSI were identified by International Classification Diagnosis (Ninth Revision) codes of 805, 806, 839, or 952. We only included the patients who received the blow to the head and face. For eligible patients, we extracted data from trauma registry and inpatient chart review, including radiographic reports. A single author (N.K.) reviewed computed tomography (CT) scan of all individuals with CSI. We performed summary and Spearman rank correlation statistical analysis with p value <0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,335 patients met our study inclusion criteria. All underwent CT of the head, cervical spine, and/or face. CSI was suspected in 78 patients; however, 65 had normal CT results and were diagnosed instead with a cervical sprain. Of the remaining 13 patients, two had a herniated disc, two had spinal stenosis, and nine had a fracture or dislocation, yielding a CSI incidence of 0.7%. We found no correlation between an increased incidence of CSI and either severe head trauma (low Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score) (r = -0.02, p = 0.58) or severe facial trauma (high face Abbreviated Injury Scale score [f-AIS]) (r = 0.02, p = 0.59). Three patients had significant subluxation; only two had associated spinal cord injury (SCI). All three required surgical fusion, and all three reported a fall after assault without significant head or face trauma.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CSI after blunt assault is very low, and the pattern of injury and severity is related to a fall occurring after the assault. Our results should encourage clinicians to find out if patient falls after the assault.

摘要

背景

钝性颈椎损伤(CSI)的损伤机制涉及两种力:(1)加速度-减速度力或速度变化(Δ v),导致头部和颈部发生显著运动,从而导致屈伸损伤模式;(2)头部或面部受到直接力撞击到固定物体,力沿颈椎传递。这两种力的结合被生物工程师称为传递能(IE)。在钝性头部或面部撞击中,IE 较低;因此,报告的 CSI 发生率较低。我们的研究目的是确定钝性受打击患者 CSI 的发生率、模式和结果。

方法

我们在我们的一级创伤中心的创伤登记处查询了 5 年内(2005-2009 年)诊断为钝性打击的患者。通过国际疾病分类诊断(第九版)代码 805、806、839 或 952 识别出 CSI 患者。我们只包括了那些头部和面部受到打击的患者。对于符合条件的患者,我们从创伤登记处和住院病历回顾中提取数据,包括放射学报告。一位作者(N.K.)审查了所有 CSI 患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)。我们进行了汇总和斯皮尔曼秩相关统计分析,p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在研究期间,有 1335 名患者符合我们的研究纳入标准。所有患者均接受了头部、颈椎和/或面部的 CT 检查。怀疑有 78 名患者存在 CSI,但 65 名患者的 CT 结果正常,被诊断为颈椎扭伤。在其余 13 名患者中,有 2 名患者椎间盘突出,2 名患者椎管狭窄,9 名患者骨折或脱位,CSI 发生率为 0.7%。我们发现 CSI 发生率与严重头部创伤(低格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]评分)(r = -0.02,p = 0.58)或严重面部创伤(高面部损伤严重程度评分[f-AIS])(r = 0.02,p = 0.59)之间无相关性。有 3 名患者有明显的半脱位,只有 2 名患者伴有脊髓损伤(SCI)。所有 3 名患者均需要手术融合,所有 3 名患者均报告在受到攻击后摔倒,且头部或面部无明显创伤。

结论

钝性打击后 CSI 的发生率非常低,损伤模式和严重程度与攻击后摔倒有关。我们的结果应该鼓励临床医生了解患者在攻击后是否摔倒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验