Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Paris Descartes University, Hôtel-Dieu University Hospital, Paris, France.
Anesthesiology. 2012 Jan;116(1):94-102. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318238c036.
As a potent anticoagulant agent, rivaroxaban exposes a risk of bleeding. An effective way to reverse its effects is needed. Objectives were to study efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) to reverse the anticoagulant effect of an overdose of rivaroxaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis.
First, a dose-ranging study assessed the minimal rivaroxaban dose that increased bleeding. Then, 48 anesthetized and ventilated rabbits were randomized into four groups: control (saline), rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban and saline), rFVIIa (rivaroxaban and rFVIIa), and PCC (rivaroxaban and PCC). The Folts model was applied: a stenosis and an injury were carried out on the carotid artery, inducing thrombosis, detected as cyclic flow reductions, which were recorded over 20 min. Then the following were measured: ear immersion bleeding time, clotting times, anti-Xa activity, thrombelastometric parameters, and thrombin generation test. Ultimately, a hepatosplenic section was performed and the total amount of blood loss after 15 min was evaluated as primary endpoint.
Rivaroxaban increased blood loss (17 g [8-32] vs. 7 g [5-18] for control (median [range]), P = 0.0004), ear bleeding time, clotting times, thrombelastographic clotting time, and decreased thrombin generation. In contrast, rFVIIa decreased ear bleeding time (92 s [65-115] vs. 140 s [75-190], P < 0.02), but without efficacy on blood loss. PCC and rFVIIa decreased activated partial thromboplastin time as well as thrombelastographic clotting time. Regarding safety, neither rFVIIa nor PCC increased cyclic flow reductions.
rFVIIa and PCC partially improved laboratory parameters, but did not reverse rivaroxaban induced-bleeding.
利伐沙班作为一种有效的抗凝剂,会增加出血风险。因此需要一种有效的方法来逆转其抗凝效果。本研究旨在探讨重组活化因子 VII(rFVIIa)和凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)对兔出血和血栓模型中过量利伐沙班抗凝作用的逆转效果及安全性。
首先,进行了一项剂量范围研究,以评估增加出血的最小利伐沙班剂量。然后,将 48 只麻醉和通气的兔子随机分为四组:对照组(生理盐水)、利伐沙班组(利伐沙班和生理盐水)、rFVIIa 组(利伐沙班和 rFVIIa)和 PCC 组(利伐沙班和 PCC)。应用 Folts 模型:在颈总动脉上进行狭窄和损伤,诱导血栓形成,通过循环血流减少来检测,记录 20 分钟。然后测量以下参数:耳朵浸渍出血时间、凝血时间、抗-Xa 活性、血栓弹性图参数和凝血酶生成试验。最后,进行肝脾切片,15 分钟后评估总出血量作为主要终点。
利伐沙班增加了出血(17 g [8-32] vs. 7 g [5-18],对照组(中位数[范围]),P = 0.0004)、耳朵出血时间、凝血时间、血栓弹性图凝血时间,并减少了凝血酶生成。相比之下,rFVIIa 缩短了耳朵出血时间(92 s [65-115] vs. 140 s [75-190],P < 0.02),但对出血无疗效。PCC 和 rFVIIa 缩短了活化部分凝血活酶时间和血栓弹性图凝血时间。关于安全性,rFVIIa 和 PCC 均未增加循环血流减少。
rFVIIa 和 PCC 部分改善了实验室参数,但未能逆转利伐沙班引起的出血。