Sánchez-García Manuel, Martínez-Sánchez Francisco, van der Hofstadt Román Carlos J
Agencia Valenciana de Salud, USMA Campoamor, 03010 Alicante, Spain.
Psicothema. 2011 Nov;23(4):713-8.
The results of this study are part of an investigation to determine whether the cognitive-emotional process of emotional recognition is deficient as a function of the clinical condition and alexithymia in subjects with somatization. This investigation applied the self-assessment of emotion and used a procedure that minimizes the use of verbal skills and verbal comprehension. The specific goal of this study was to verify whether there were differences in the covariation between alexithymia and self-evaluation of the emotional reaction in clinical and nonclinical subjects. The results of this study highlight the significant differences between clinical and control subjects. There were inverse significant correlations with the affective valence in clinical subjects, whereas in the ratings of the TAS-20 in control subjects, there were direct correlations with activation. In the conclusions, we discuss whether the variability of the results of previous research of the relationship between alexithymia and emotional recognition is a characteristic feature of this relationship or an effect of the different sampling and procedures utilized.
本研究结果是一项调查的一部分,该调查旨在确定在躯体化患者中,情绪识别的认知 - 情感过程是否因临床状况和述情障碍而存在缺陷。这项调查采用了情绪自我评估,并使用了一种尽量减少语言技能和语言理解使用的程序。本研究的具体目标是验证在临床和非临床受试者中,述情障碍与情绪反应自我评估之间的协变是否存在差异。本研究结果突出了临床受试者与对照受试者之间的显著差异。临床受试者中与情感效价呈显著负相关,而在对照受试者的TAS - 20评分中,与激活呈正相关。在结论中,我们讨论了先前关于述情障碍与情绪识别关系的研究结果的变异性是这种关系的一个特征,还是所采用的不同抽样和程序的影响。