Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
J Endourol. 2012 Feb;26(2):147-51. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0234. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Minimally invasive techniques are currently used for numerous urologic procedures, given decreased morbidity and equivalent outcomes to open surgery. There is, however, a relative paucity of data related to robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation (RAUR) in adult patients for benign stricture disease. We sought to determine the periprocedure outcomes of open distal ureteral reimplantation vs RAUR at our institution.
We retrospectively identified 10 consecutive mid/distal RAUR procedures performed by one surgeon since 2005. Twenty-four patients undergoing open mid/distal ureter reconstruction over the same period were identified, and 10 controls matched for age and body mass index (BMI) were used for comparison. Demographic, operative, and clinical/radiographic outcomes were compared.
Etiology of the strictures included stone disease (n=8, 40%), iatrogenic injury during previous abdominopelvic surgery (n=10, 50%), or other causes (n=2, 10%). None of the robotic procedures necessitated conversion to open surgery. No intraoperative complications occurred. Six neocystostomies, three psoas hitches, and one Boari flap were completed in an open fashion. Four neocystostomies, four psoas hitches, and two Boari flaps were performed in the RAUR group. Estimated blood loss (30.6 vs 327.5 mL, P=0.001) and length of hospital stay (2.4 vs 5.1 d, P=0.01) were significantly reduced in the robotic group. Median BMI (29.4±5.3 vs 26.5±5.2, P=0.130) and operative time in minutes (306.6 vs 270.0 min, P=0.316) were higher in the robotic group, although these were not statistically significant. None of the patients in either group had clinical or radiologic evidence of recurrent stricture disease at a median follow-up of 30 and 24 months in the open and RAUR groups, respectively. The retrospective comparative nature of this study may introduce selection bias.
In experienced hands, RAUR for mid/distal benign ureteral strictures appears to be a reasonable alternative to open surgery.
微创技术目前被广泛应用于许多泌尿科手术,因为与开放手术相比,微创技术具有较低的发病率和相当的治疗效果。然而,对于成人良性狭窄疾病,机器人辅助输尿管再植术(RAUR)相关数据相对较少。我们旨在确定本机构开放远端输尿管再植术与 RAUR 的围手术期结果。
我们回顾性地确定了自 2005 年以来同一位外科医生进行的 10 例连续的 RAUR 手术。同期确定了 24 例接受开放中远端输尿管重建的患者,选择了 10 例年龄和体重指数(BMI)匹配的对照,用于比较。比较了人口统计学、手术和临床/影像学结果。
狭窄的病因包括结石疾病(n=8,40%)、先前腹盆腔手术期间医源性损伤(n=10,50%)或其他原因(n=2,10%)。没有机器人手术需要转为开放手术。没有发生术中并发症。6 例新的吻合口、3 例腰大肌悬带和 1 例 Boari 皮瓣以开放方式完成。RAUR 组完成了 4 例新的吻合口、4 例腰大肌悬带和 2 例 Boari 皮瓣。机器人组的估计失血量(30.6 与 327.5 mL,P=0.001)和住院时间(2.4 与 5.1 d,P=0.01)显著减少。机器人组的中位 BMI(29.4±5.3 与 26.5±5.2,P=0.130)和手术时间(306.6 与 270.0 min,P=0.316)较高,但无统计学意义。在开放组和 RAUR 组分别随访中位数为 30 个月和 24 个月时,两组均无患者出现临床或影像学复发性狭窄疾病的证据。本研究的回顾性比较性质可能会引入选择偏倚。
在经验丰富的医生手中,RAUR 治疗中远端良性输尿管狭窄似乎是开放手术的合理替代方法。