Wotton S B, O'Callaghan M
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Division of Food Animal Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Meat Sci. 2002 Feb;60(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/s0309-1740(01)00122-x.
The concept of a 'fail-safe' device to ensure that sufficient current is delivered to render a pig immediately unconscious when electrically stunned was investigated. For live pigs, no significant correlation could be determined between the pre-stun low voltage sensed impedance and the actual, higher voltage stun impedance. In contrast, a good correlation was found using heads from pigs killed more than 24 h previously. The impedance of a live pig's head was predominantly a function of the stunning voltage and decreased non-linearly with increasing voltage. The 'difference' between live and dead pigs was attributed to an 'ageing effect' which is not significant in the first few hours post mortem. No change in phase angle between corresponding stunning current and voltage waveforms, indicated that tissue reactance was not a contributing factor. It is concluded that 'fail-safe' devices based on low voltage pre-stun sensing are unlikely to meet the current legislative requirements (Council Directive 93/119/EC).
对一种“故障安全”装置的概念进行了研究,该装置旨在确保在电击致昏猪时能提供足够电流使其立即失去意识。对于活猪,电击前低电压感应阻抗与实际较高电压致昏阻抗之间未发现显著相关性。相比之下,使用死亡超过24小时的猪的头部进行研究时发现了良好的相关性。活猪头的阻抗主要是致昏电压的函数,并随电压升高呈非线性下降。活猪和死猪之间的“差异”归因于一种“老化效应”,这种效应在死后最初几小时内并不显著。相应的致昏电流和电压波形之间的相角没有变化,表明组织电抗不是一个影响因素。得出的结论是,基于电击前低电压感应的“故障安全”装置不太可能满足当前的立法要求(理事会指令93/119/EC)。