Suppr超能文献

在评估学生确定棘突位置的技能时,允许存在一定的误差范围。

Allowing a possible margin of error when assessing student skills in spinous process location.

作者信息

Hart John, Neely Cheneir

机构信息

Sherman College of Chiropractic.

出版信息

J Chiropr Educ. 2011 Fall;25(2):182-5. doi: 10.7899/1042-5055-25.2.182.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Spinal palpation is subject to inconsistency between examiners. When testing students on the location of vertebral spinous processes, faculty examiners may wish to allow for a margin of error that is observed between experienced practitioners. This study attempts to determine such a margin of error for selected vertebral levels that could be allowed in testing situations at Sherman Chiropractic College. This could serve as a model for other chiropractic colleges in determining their margins of error.

METHODS

Two faculty clinicians palpated spinous processes at four different vertebral levels (C2, T3, T9, and L2) on 18 student volunteers. Differences for each vertebral level, along with one, two, and three standard deviations, were calculated.

RESULTS

AVERAGE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EXAMINERS INCREASED CAUDALLY, AS FOLLOWS: C2, 4.23 ± 3.77 mm; T3, 13.41 ± 10.53 mm; T9, 18.17 ± 17.62 mm; L2, 18.70 ± 16.58 mm.

DISCUSSION

In this study, faculty examiners exhibited variation in their locations of spinous processes for these vertebrae. These variations could be allowed when assessing student skills in locating these spinous processes at this chiropractic college.

CONCLUSION

In this study, differences between examiners plus or minus one standard deviation ranged from 4.23 ± 3.77 mm for C2 to 18.70 ± 16.58 mm for L2. The concept of margin of error should be considered by faculty examiners when assessing the skill of students in locating the spinous process of various vertebral levels.

摘要

引言

脊椎触诊在检查者之间存在不一致性。在测试学生对脊椎棘突位置的掌握情况时,教师考官可能希望考虑到经验丰富的从业者之间所观察到的误差范围。本研究旨在确定在谢尔曼脊椎按摩学院的测试情境中,选定脊椎水平的这种误差范围。这可以作为其他脊椎按摩学院确定其误差范围的一个模型。

方法

两名教师临床医生对18名学生志愿者的四个不同脊椎水平(C2、T3、T9和L2)的棘突进行触诊。计算每个脊椎水平的差异以及一、二和三个标准差。

结果

检查者之间的平均差异向尾侧增加,如下所示:C2,4.23±3.77毫米;T3,13.41±10.53毫米;T9,18.17±17.62毫米;L2,18.70±16.58毫米。

讨论

在本研究中,教师考官对这些椎骨棘突位置的判断存在差异。在评估该脊椎按摩学院学生定位这些棘突的技能时,可以允许这些差异。

结论

在本研究中,检查者之间的差异加上或减去一个标准差范围从C2的4.23±3.77毫米到L2的18.70±16.58毫米。教师考官在评估学生定位不同脊椎水平棘突的技能时应考虑误差范围的概念。

相似文献

1
Allowing a possible margin of error when assessing student skills in spinous process location.
J Chiropr Educ. 2011 Fall;25(2):182-5. doi: 10.7899/1042-5055-25.2.182.
2
Palpatory accuracy of lumbar spinous processes using multiple bony landmarks.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Jun;34(5):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 14.
3
Spinous process palpation using the scapular tip as a landmark vs a radiographic criterion standard.
J Chiropr Med. 2007 Sep;6(3):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcme.2007.07.001.
5
The Accuracy of Locating Lumbar Vertebrae When Using Palpation Versus Ultrasonography.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Jul-Aug;39(6):387-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 26.
6
Mapping intended spinal site of care from the upright to prone position: an interexaminer reliability study.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 May 16;22:20. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-22-20. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Spinous process palpation using the scapular tip as a landmark vs a radiographic criterion standard.
J Chiropr Med. 2007 Sep;6(3):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcme.2007.07.001.
2
A review of intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of static spinal palpation: a literature synthesis.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Jun;32(5):379-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.04.010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验