• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化和种族会影响青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的 Scoliosis Research Society 量表的结果。

Culture and ethnicity influence outcomes of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):1072-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823ed962.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823ed962
PMID:22076648
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

To report preoperative differences in the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument (SRS-30) between multiple US ethnicities and native Japanese and Korean children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The SRS-24 was developed in a US cohort with AIS. Comparative studies using the SRS-24 between US and Japanese patients showed differences, suggesting that culture might affect functional outcome.

METHODS

Preoperative SRS-30 outcomes were collected from 1853 children with AIS from 6 different ethnic groups: US white (1234), black (213), Hispanic (78), and Asian (29), as well as native Japanese (192) and Koreans (107). Analysis of covariance of 4 SRS-30 domains (pain, appearance, activity, and mental) was compared between groups adjusting for differences in age, sex, major curve magnitude, and body mass index. Pairwise comparisons of the 4 SRS-30 domains were adjusted for multiple comparisons, using Bonferroni correction. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Significant differences between ethnicities were found in all domains (P < 0.001). Whites reported more pain than Japanese or Koreans (Japanese = 4.52, Korean = 4.47, white = 4.04). Korean and Japanese patients had the lowest appearance scores (Japanese = 2.89, Korean = 2.73, US Asian = 3.55, Hispanic = 3.11, black = 3.47, white = 3.29). Koreans also had the lowest activity (Korean = 3.64, Japanese = 4.24, US Asian = 4.07, Hispanic = 4.02, black = 4.06, white = 4.16), mental (Korean = 3.70, Japanese = 4.23, US Asian = 4.05, Hispanic = 3.75, black = 4.03, white = 3.94), and total scores (Korean = 3.63, Japanese = 3.92, US Asian = 4.02, Hispanic = 3.75, black = 3.92, and white = 3.84).

CONCLUSION

Culture and ethnicity influence SRS-30 outcomes in AIS. Whites reported more pain than Japanese and Koreans. Japanese and Koreans had the lowest appearance scores. Koreans additionally were distinguished by the lowest activity, mental, and total scores. These cultural and ethnic differences must be taken into account when counseling patients with AIS and studying functional outcomes.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性比较研究。

目的

报告在患有青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)的多个美国族裔和本土日本及韩国儿童中,术前使用 Scoliosis Research Society 结果工具(SRS-30)的差异。

背景资料概要

SRS-24 在美国 AIS 队列中开发。使用 SRS-24 对美国和日本患者进行的比较研究显示出差异,表明文化可能会影响功能结果。

方法

从来自 6 个不同族裔的 1853 名 AIS 儿童中收集术前 SRS-30 结果:美国白人(1234 名)、黑人(213 名)、西班牙裔(78 名)和亚洲裔(29 名),以及本土日本(192 名)和韩国人(107 名)。对 4 个 SRS-30 领域(疼痛、外观、活动和心理)进行协方差分析,在调整年龄、性别、主曲线幅度和体重指数差异的情况下进行比较。使用 Bonferroni 校正对 4 个 SRS-30 领域进行两两比较的多重比较调整。P 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在所有领域均发现族裔之间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。白人报告的疼痛比日本人和韩国人更严重(日本人=4.52,韩国人=4.47,白人=4.04)。韩国人和日本人的外观评分最低(日本人=2.89,韩国人=2.73,美国亚洲裔=3.55,西班牙裔=3.11,黑人=3.47,白人=3.29)。韩国人活动评分也最低(韩国人=3.64,日本人=4.24,美国亚洲裔=4.07,西班牙裔=4.02,黑人=4.06,白人=4.16)、心理评分(韩国人=3.70,日本人=4.23,美国亚洲裔=4.05,西班牙裔=3.75,黑人=4.03,白人=3.94)和总分(韩国人=3.63,日本人=3.92,美国亚洲裔=4.02,西班牙裔=3.75,黑人=3.92,白人=3.84)。

结论

文化和族裔影响 AIS 的 SRS-30 结果。白人报告的疼痛比日本人和韩国人更严重。日本人和韩国人的外观评分最低。韩国人还表现出活动、心理和总分最低。在 AIS 患者咨询和研究功能结果时,必须考虑这些文化和族裔差异。

相似文献

1
Culture and ethnicity influence outcomes of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.文化和种族会影响青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的 Scoliosis Research Society 量表的结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):1072-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823ed962.
2
Ethnic Variation in Satisfaction and Appearance Concerns in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion With Instrumentation.接受后路脊柱融合内固定术的特发性脊柱侧弯青少年患者在满意度和外观担忧方面的种族差异。
Spine Deform. 2018 Mar-Apr;6(2):148-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
3
Cross-cultural comparison of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument between American and Japanese idiopathic scoliosis patients: are there differences?美国和日本特发性脊柱侧凸患者之间脊柱侧凸研究学会疗效评估工具的跨文化比较:是否存在差异?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2711-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a7ef0.
4
Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part I: comparison with nonscoliosis group: preliminary/limited review in a Japanese population.使用脊柱侧凸研究学会疗效评估工具评估日本未经治疗的特发性脊柱侧凸患者的治疗效果:第一部分:与非脊柱侧凸组比较:日本人群的初步/有限综述
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 15;30(10):1197-201. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000162284.38214.53.
5
Demographic factors affect Scoliosis Research Society-22 performance in healthy adolescents: a comparative baseline for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.人口统计学因素影响健康青少年的 Scoliosis Research Society-22 评分:特发性脊柱侧凸青少年的基线比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 15;35(24):2134-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb474f.
6
International utilization of the SRS-22 instrument to assess outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what can we learn from a medical outreach group in Ghana?SRS-22工具在国际上用于评估青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的结果:我们能从加纳的一个医疗外展小组中学到什么?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(5):503-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000137.
7
Disease severity and treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the impact of race and economic status.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疾病严重程度与治疗:种族和经济状况的影响。
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):939-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.043. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
8
Effect of spinal deformity on adolescent quality of life: comparison of operative scheuermann kyphosis, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and normal controls.脊柱畸形对青少年生活质量的影响:Scheuermann 驼背症手术、青少年特发性脊柱侧弯与正常对照组的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):1049-55. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182893c01.
9
Associations between three-dimensional measurements of the spinal deformity and preoperative SRS-22 scores in patients undergoing surgery for major thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.在接受大型胸椎青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术的患者中,脊柱畸形的三维测量与术前 SRS-22 评分之间的相关性。
Spine Deform. 2020 Dec;8(6):1253-1260. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00150-0. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
10
Prevalence of postoperative pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the association with preoperative pain.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸术后疼痛的发生率及与术前疼痛的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 1;38(21):1848-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a4aa97.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural course of moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a mean 25-year follow-up study.中度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的自然病程:一项平均25年的随访研究。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09135-x.
2
Satisfaction following correction of spinal deformity: Cultural and regional effects on outcome.脊柱畸形矫正后的满意度:文化和地区对结果的影响。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Feb 24;18:100319. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100319. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Evaluating consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for early-onset scoliosis: new generation and international perspectives.
评估早发性脊柱侧凸治疗方案的共识和不确定性:新一代和国际视角。
Spine Deform. 2023 Sep;11(5):1271-1282. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00713-x. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
4
Back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: the contribution of morphological and psychological factors.特发性脊柱侧凸青少年的背痛:形态学和心理学因素的贡献。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Aug;29(8):1959-1971. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06489-2. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
5
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and back pain.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯与背痛。
Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016 Sep 9;11(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13013-016-0086-7. eCollection 2016.
6
HRQoL assessment by SRS-30 for Chinese patients with surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).采用SRS-30对接受手术治疗的中国青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者进行健康相关生活质量评估。
Scoliosis. 2015 Feb 11;10(Suppl 2):S19. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S19. eCollection 2015.