Department of Physics, Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics, and Institute for the Science of Origins, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Dec 28;369(1957):5018-41. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0292.
The combination of general relativity (GR) and the Standard Model of particle physics disagrees with numerous observations on scales from our Solar System up. In the canonical concordance model of Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmology, many of these contradictions between theory and data are removed or alleviated by the introduction of three completely independent new components of stress energy--the inflaton, dark matter and dark energy. Each of these in its turn is meant to have dominated (or to currently dominate) the dynamics of the Universe. There is, until now, no non-gravitational evidence for any of these dark sectors, nor is there evidence (though there may be motivation) for the required extension of the Standard Model. An alternative is to imagine that it is GR that must be modified to account for some or all of these disagreements. Certain coincidences of scale even suggest that one might expect not to make independent modifications of the theory to replace each of the three dark sectors. Because they must address the most different types of data, attempts to replace dark matter with modified gravity are the most controversial. A phenomenological model (or family of models), modified Newtonian dynamics, has, over the last few years, seen several covariant realizations. We discuss a number of challenges that any model that seeks to replace dark matter with modified gravity must face: the loss of Birkhoff's theorem, and the calculational simplifications it implies; the failure to explain clusters, whether static or interacting, and the consequent need to introduce dark matter of some form, whether hot dark matter neutrinos or dark fields that arise in new sectors of the modified gravity theory; the intrusion of cosmological expansion into the modified force law, which arises precisely because of the coincidence in scale between the centripetal acceleration at which Newtonian gravity fails in galaxies and the cosmic acceleration. We conclude with the observation that, although modified gravity may indeed manage to replace dark matter, it is likely to do so by becoming or at least incorporating a dark matter theory itself.
广义相对论(GR)与粒子物理标准模型的结合在从我们的太阳系到更大尺度上的大量观测中存在分歧。在Λ冷暗物质(ΛCDM)宇宙学的典型一致性模型中,通过引入三种完全独立的新应力能成分——原初引力子、暗物质和暗能量,可以消除或缓解理论与数据之间的许多矛盾。每一种都被认为曾经(或目前)主导着宇宙的动力学。到目前为止,还没有任何非引力证据表明存在这些暗物质领域,也没有证据(尽管可能有动机)表明需要扩展标准模型。另一种选择是设想必须修改广义相对论来解释其中的一些或全部分歧。某些尺度上的巧合甚至表明,人们可能期望不必对理论进行独立的修改来替代这三个暗物质领域中的每一个。由于它们必须解决最不同类型的数据,因此尝试用修正引力来替代暗物质是最具争议的。修正牛顿动力学等具有协变实现的唯象模型(或模型族)在过去几年中已经出现。我们讨论了任何试图用修正引力替代暗物质的模型都必须面对的一些挑战:失去了 Birkhoff 定理及其所暗示的计算简化;无法解释无论是静态还是相互作用的星系团,因此需要引入某种形式的暗物质,无论是热暗物质中微子还是修正引力理论新领域中出现的暗场;宇宙膨胀侵入修正力定律,这正是由于在星系中牛顿引力失效的向心力与宇宙加速之间的尺度巧合而产生的。最后我们观察到,尽管修正引力确实可能设法替代暗物质,但它很可能通过成为或至少纳入暗物质理论本身来实现。