Platt K L, Pfeiffer E, Petrovic P, Friesel H, Beermann D, Hecker E, Oesch F
Institute of Toxicology, University of Mainz, FRG.
Carcinogenesis. 1990 Oct;11(10):1721-6. doi: 10.1093/carcin/11.10.1721.
The carcinogenic activity of the two polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), picene (benzo[a]chrysene) and dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DBA), was determined in NMRI mice by five different experimental protocols in order to find out if picene is a carcinogen as predicted by recent quantum mechanical calculations in contrast to earlier observations which could not confirm any carcinogenic activity of picene. Single s.c. treatment of adult mice with picene or DBA (308 nmol/animal, each) led to the formation of fibrosarcomas in 63.3% of treated animals regardless of the PAH used. Chronic epicutaneous application of both PAHs (total dose 1.36 mumol) to the back of mice resulted in the development of papillomas with a tumor rate of 22% in the case of picene and of 32% in the case of DBA. When newborn mice were s.c. treated once on day 2 of their life with each of the two PAHs (400 nmol/animal), 27.8% of treated animals developed lung adenomas after 40 weeks in the case of picene compared to 92.1% in the case of DBA. Histopathological examination of the tumors in the three experimental models revealed no difference in the type of tumor between picene and DBA. Epicutaneous application of both PAHs (600 nmol/animal) followed by chronic treatment with 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate for 24 weeks led to the formation of papillomas in 93% of animals treated with DBA while picene showed no tumorigenic activity at all. Initiation of tumorigenesis in the two-stage tumor model with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (1 mumol/animal) and chronic treatment with picene (total dose 4.8 mumol) for 24 weeks was equally ineffective in producing tumors in NMRI mice. This rare biological property of picene, which is a complete carcinogen, yet at most a very weak tumor initiator, is explained in terms of its inefficient biotransformation to mutagenic and carcinogenic metabolites as compared to the strong tumor initiator DBA.
为了弄清楚芘(苯并[a]屈)是否如最近量子力学计算所预测的那样是一种致癌物,与早期无法证实芘有任何致癌活性的观察结果形成对比,我们通过五种不同的实验方案在NMRI小鼠中测定了两种多环芳烃(PAHs)芘和二苯并[a,h]蒽(DBA)的致癌活性。对成年小鼠进行单次皮下注射芘或DBA(每只动物308纳摩尔),无论使用哪种PAH,63.3%的受试动物都会形成纤维肉瘤。将两种PAHs(总剂量1.36微摩尔)长期经皮涂抹于小鼠背部,芘组的乳头状瘤发生率为22%,DBA组为32%。在新生小鼠出生第2天对其进行单次皮下注射两种PAHs中的每一种(每只动物400纳摩尔),40周后,芘组27.8%的受试动物发生了肺腺瘤,而DBA组为92.1%。在这三种实验模型中对肿瘤进行组织病理学检查发现,芘和DBA之间的肿瘤类型没有差异。对两种PAHs(每只动物600纳摩尔)进行经皮涂抹,随后用12 - O - 十四烷酰佛波醇 - 13 - 乙酸酯进行24周的长期处理,93%接受DBA处理的动物形成了乳头状瘤,而芘则完全没有致瘤活性。在两阶段肿瘤模型中,用7,12 - 二甲基苯并[a]蒽(每只动物1微摩尔)启动肿瘤发生,并用芘(总剂量4.8微摩尔)进行24周的长期处理,在NMRI小鼠中产生肿瘤同样无效。芘这种罕见的生物学特性,即它是一种完全致癌物,但至多是一种非常弱的肿瘤启动剂,可通过与强肿瘤启动剂DBA相比,其向诱变和致癌代谢物的生物转化效率低下得到解释。