Suppr超能文献

促红细胞生成素刺激剂对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的影响:系统评价。

Effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;68(5):469-77. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1160-y. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Current evidence suggests that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), including erythropoietin and darbepoetin, may have a direct cardio-protective effect. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of ESAs in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have yielded heterogeneous results. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of RCTs to assess whether the administration of ESAs can improve cardiac functional parameters, such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and attenuate infarct size in patients with acute STEMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The PubMed, EBSCO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant RCT studies on ESAs published before May 13, 2011. A total of nine RCTs involving 1,244 participants were identified. The original data of these studies were aggregated using fixed effect models. Compared with controls, the administration of ESAs showed a slight but significant improvement in LVEF (1.38%; 95% confidence interval 0.38-2.37%; p = 0.007). However, no significant improvement in LVEDV, LVESV, and infarct size was observed, and no increase in all-cause severe adverse effect was indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicates that the superiority of ESAs over conventional therapy in patients with acute STEMI is limited using current procedures. However, there is evidence to suggest that the timing and dosing of ESA administration may be optimized. Moreover, the long-term cardio-protective effect of ESAs in this patient population may be beneficial and worth exploring.

摘要

目的

目前的证据表明,红细胞生成刺激剂(ESAs),包括促红细胞生成素和达贝泊汀,可能具有直接的心脏保护作用。然而,评估 ESAs 在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)得出了不一致的结果。在这里,我们对 RCT 进行了荟萃分析,以评估 ESAs 的给药是否可以改善心脏功能参数,如左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)和左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV),并减轻急性 STEMI 患者的梗死面积。

方法和结果

我们检索了 PubMed、EBSCO、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库,以获取截至 2011 年 5 月 13 日发表的关于 ESAs 的相关 RCT 研究。共确定了 9 项涉及 1244 名参与者的 RCT。使用固定效应模型汇总这些研究的原始数据。与对照组相比,ESA 的给药显示 LVEF 略有但显著改善(1.38%;95%置信区间 0.38-2.37%;p = 0.007)。然而,LVEDV、LVESV 和梗死面积没有显著改善,也没有指出全因严重不良事件增加。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,与传统治疗相比,ESAs 在急性 STEMI 患者中的优势是有限的,目前的方法是这样。然而,有证据表明,ESA 给药的时机和剂量可能需要优化。此外,ESA 在该患者人群中的长期心脏保护作用可能是有益的,值得探索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验