Uehleke Bernhard, Brignoli Reto, Rostock Matthias, Saller Reinhard, Melzer Jörg
Institute of Complementary Medicine, University Hospital Zurich.
Forsch Komplementmed. 2011;18(5):249-56. doi: 10.1159/000332820. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
Treatment of rheumatic or musculoskeletal disorders (MD) is multi-disciplinary and includes herbal analgesics. Although already reviewed, no quantitative evaluation of efficacy and safety of the herbal combination Phytodolor® (STW1) is available.
We searched in databases and contacted authors and the manufacturer to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining STW1 in patients with MD. We made a reanalysis of raw data of eligible published and unpublished RCTs and pooled the results for meta-analysis according to Cochrane guidelines and intention-to-treat. Primary outcome measure was patient global assessment of efficacy, secondary outcome measure was pain at rest and on movement. Results were stratified according to treatment groups.
Patient data of 11 RCTs were eligible for pooling. In the entire population, STW1 was significantly superior compared to placebo in patients' global assessment of efficacy (group difference for rating very good/good: 20%; placebo 48.9% and STW1 69.1%; p < 0.001; OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.65) and in the subpopulation 'other rheumatic diseases' (placebo 45.4%; STW1 72.3%; p < 0.001; OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.2-0.52), but not in the subpopulation 'gonarthrosis'. STW1 did not differ significantly compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), neither in the entire population nor the subpopulations. Similar results were found for pain at rest and on movement. No serious adverse events (AE) but minor AE were reported (placebo 8.1%; STW1 14.2%; NSAIDs 18.9%).
According to the analysed data, STW1 showed a better pain reduction than placebo in patients with pain due to MD, probably equivalent to NSAIDs, and was well tolerated.
风湿性或肌肉骨骼疾病(MD)的治疗是多学科的,包括草药镇痛药。尽管已有相关综述,但尚无关于草药组合Phytodolor®(STW1)疗效和安全性的定量评估。
我们在数据库中进行检索,并联系作者和制造商以识别在MD患者中研究STW1的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们对符合条件的已发表和未发表RCT的原始数据进行重新分析,并根据Cochrane指南和意向性分析汇总结果进行荟萃分析。主要结局指标是患者对疗效的整体评估,次要结局指标是静息和运动时的疼痛。结果根据治疗组进行分层。
11项RCT的患者数据符合汇总条件。在总体人群中,在患者对疗效的整体评估方面,STW1显著优于安慰剂(评估为非常好/好的组间差异:20%;安慰剂组为48.9%,STW1组为69.1%;p<0.001;OR 0.43;95%CI 0.28 - 0.65),在“其他风湿性疾病”亚组中也是如此(安慰剂组为45.4%,STW1组为72.3%;p<0.001;OR 0.32;95%CI 0.2 - 0.52),但在“膝骨关节炎”亚组中并非如此。在总体人群和各亚组中,STW1与非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)相比均无显著差异。静息和运动时的疼痛情况也得到了类似结果。未报告严重不良事件(AE),但报告了轻微AE(安慰剂组8.1%;STW1组14.2%;NSAIDs组18.9%)。
根据分析数据,STW1在因MD引起疼痛的患者中显示出比安慰剂更好的疼痛缓解效果,可能与NSAIDs相当,且耐受性良好。