• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索澳大利亚医疗保健政策与规划文件中的公平、社会正义及社会决定因素相关论述。

Exploring discourses of equity, social justice and social determinants in Australian health care policy and planning documents.

作者信息

Young Janette, McGrath Richard

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(4):369-77. doi: 10.1071/PY11038.

DOI:10.1071/PY11038
PMID:22112706
Abstract

The Australian National Health Reform agenda includes aims to reduce health disadvantages and provide equitable access. However, this reform will be implemented through state and territory governments, and as such will be built on existing conceptualisations of health as a social justice concept (core to understandings of social determinants). A selection of state and territory health policy documents were analysed within a critical discourse framework focussing on their use of terms relating to social determinants. Analysis revealed that the understandings of social justice concepts vary across Australia and are generally apolitical, belying core concerns inherent in a social determinants understanding. Such differentiation bears recognition by reformers seeking to implement national consistency. This paper also considers how health professionals might become aware of their own cultural enmeshment in neo-liberal frameworks of understanding, recognising a social determinants framework as counter-cultural and hence requiring radical thinking.

摘要

澳大利亚国家卫生改革议程旨在减少健康方面的不利因素,并提供公平的医疗服务。然而,这项改革将通过州和地区政府来实施,因此将建立在现有的将健康视为社会正义概念(理解社会决定因素的核心)的概念之上。在一个批判性话语框架内,对一系列州和地区的卫生政策文件进行了分析,重点关注它们对与社会决定因素相关术语的使用。分析表明,澳大利亚各地对社会正义概念的理解各不相同,而且通常不涉及政治,这掩盖了社会决定因素理解中固有的核心问题。这种差异值得寻求全国一致性的改革者认可。本文还探讨了卫生专业人员如何意识到自己在新自由主义理解框架中的文化束缚,认识到社会决定因素框架与主流文化相悖,因此需要激进的思维。

相似文献

1
Exploring discourses of equity, social justice and social determinants in Australian health care policy and planning documents.探索澳大利亚医疗保健政策与规划文件中的公平、社会正义及社会决定因素相关论述。
Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(4):369-77. doi: 10.1071/PY11038.
2
Population health planning for health equity.促进健康公平的人群健康规划。
Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(4):327-33. doi: 10.1071/PY11044.
3
Reflections on the framing of 'health equity' in the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework: a cause for celebration or concern?对《国家初级卫生保健战略框架》中“卫生公平”框架的思考:值得庆祝还是值得关注?
Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Apr;25(1):42-5. doi: 10.1071/HE13106.
4
Dear health minister: tend the garden but make sure you fence the crocodiles.尊敬的卫生部长:打理花园时要确保把鳄鱼都圈起来。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Apr;68(4):295-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203040. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
5
Addressing the social determinants of children's health: a cliff analogy.解决儿童健康的社会决定因素:一个悬崖类比。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20(4 Suppl):1-12. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0228.
6
[Understanding local concepts of equity to formulate public health policies in Burkina Faso].[理解布基纳法索当地的公平概念以制定公共卫生政策]
Promot Educ. 2006;13(4):252-6, 235.
7
Promoting health equity in conflict-affected fragile states.促进冲突影响下的脆弱国家的健康公平。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(1):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.032. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
8
An evaluation of the Australian government's policy of access and equity strategy in selected localities.对澳大利亚政府在某些地区实施的准入与公平战略政策的评估。
J Health Soc Policy. 1993;5(2):15-34. doi: 10.1300/J045v05n02_02.
9
The relevance of equity in health care for primary care: creating and sustaining a 'fair go, for a fair innings'.初级保健中医疗保健公平性的相关性:创造并维持“公平竞争,公平人生”。
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(1):49-54.
10
Ethnic aged discrimination and disparities in health and social care: a question of social justice.种族老年歧视以及健康与社会护理方面的差异:一个社会正义问题。
Australas J Ageing. 2008 Sep;27(3):110-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00311.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Connecting knowledge with action for health equity: a critical interpretive synthesis of promising practices.将知识与行动联系起来促进健康公平:有前途的实践的批判性解释性综合。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 26;18(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1108-x.