Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚 COX-2 NSAIDs 信誉受损的观察性研究:万络还是类效应?

An observational study of the discrediting of COX-2 NSAIDs in Australia: Vioxx or class effect?

机构信息

Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Nov 24;11:892. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-892.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

When a medicine such as rofecoxib (Vioxx) is withdrawn, or a whole class of medicines discredited such as the selective COX-2 inhibitors (COX-2s), follow-up of impacts at consumer level can be difficult and costly. The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health provides a rare opportunity to examine individual consumer medicine use following a major discrediting event, the withdrawal of rofecoxib and issuing of safety warnings on the COX-2 class of medicines. The overall objective of this paper was to examine the impact of this discrediting event on dispensing of the COX-2 class of medicines, by describing medicine switching behaviours of older Australian women using rofecoxib in September 2004; the uptake of other COX-2s; and the characteristics of women who continued using a COX-2.

METHODS

Participants were concessional beneficiary status women from the Older cohort (born 1921-26) of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health who consented to linkage to Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data, with at least one rofecoxib prescription dispensed in the 12 months before rofecoxib withdrawal. A prescription was defined as one dispensing occasion. Women were grouped by rofecoxib pattern of use: continuous (nine or more prescriptions dispensed in the 12 months prior to rofecoxib withdrawal) or non-continuous (eight or less prescriptions dispensed in the 12 months prior to rofecoxib withdrawal) users. Incidence rate per 100,000 person days and incidence risk ratio described uptake of alternate medicines, following rofecoxib withdrawal. Kaplan-Meier curves described differences in uptake patterns by medicine and pattern of rofecoxib use. Patterns of use of COX-2s in the next 100 days after first COX-2 uptake were described.

RESULTS

Medicine switches and pattern of medicines uptake differed significantly depending upon whether a woman was a continuous or non-continuous rofecoxib user prior to rofecoxib discrediting. Continuous rofecoxib users overwhelmingly switched to another COX-2 and remained continuing COX-2 users for at least 100 days post-switch.

CONCLUSIONS

The typical switching behaviour of this group of women suggests that the issues leading to the discrediting of rofecoxib were not seen as a COX-2 class effect by prescribers to this high use group of consumers.

摘要

背景

当一种药物(如罗非昔布[Vioxx])被撤回,或者一类药物(如选择性 COX-2 抑制剂[COX-2s])被质疑时,在消费者层面上进行后续影响的跟踪可能既困难又昂贵。澳大利亚妇女健康纵向研究提供了一个难得的机会,可以在重大质疑事件(罗非昔布撤回和 COX-2 类药物安全警告发布)后,对个体消费者用药情况进行研究。本文的总体目标是通过描述 2004 年 9 月使用罗非昔布的老年澳大利亚女性的药物转换行为,检查这一质疑事件对 COX-2 类药物配药的影响,描述 COX-2 类药物的使用情况;以及继续使用 COX-2 的女性的特征。

方法

参与者为澳大利亚妇女健康纵向研究中较年长队列(出生于 1921-26 年)的优惠受益地位女性,她们同意将个人资料与药品福利计划数据联系起来,并且在罗非昔布撤回前的 12 个月内至少有一张罗非昔布处方。一张处方定义为一次配药。女性按照罗非昔布的使用模式进行分组:连续(在罗非昔布撤回前的 12 个月内开具了九张或更多处方)或非连续(在罗非昔布撤回前的 12 个月内开具了八张或更少处方)使用者。罗非昔布撤回后,每 10 万人天的发生率和发病率风险比描述了替代药物的使用情况。卡普兰-迈耶曲线描述了药物使用模式和罗非昔布使用模式不同的药物使用情况。描述了首次 COX-2 吸收后 100 天内 COX-2 药物使用模式。

结果

药物转换和药物使用模式的差异在很大程度上取决于女性在罗非昔布被质疑之前是连续使用罗非昔布还是非连续使用罗非昔布。连续使用罗非昔布的患者绝大多数都转换为另一种 COX-2 药物,并且至少在转换后 100 天内继续使用 COX-2 药物。

结论

该组女性的典型转换行为表明,导致罗非昔布被质疑的问题并没有被开处方给这一高消费群体的医生视为 COX-2 类药物的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b48/3280381/5f83c5ed8acd/1471-2458-11-892-1.jpg

相似文献

1
An observational study of the discrediting of COX-2 NSAIDs in Australia: Vioxx or class effect?
BMC Public Health. 2011 Nov 24;11:892. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-892.
4
What therapies have replaced rofecoxib in Ireland?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;64(4):536-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02918.x. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
5
The effect of the withdrawal of rofecoxib on prescribing patterns of COX-2 inhibitors in Scotland.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Sep;62(3):366-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02691.x.
8
Perceived barriers to paracetamol (acetaminophen) prescribing, especially following rofecoxib withdrawal from the market.
Clin Rheumatol. 2009 May;28(5):509-19. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-1077-8. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

3
Replacing hormone therapy--is the decline in prescribing sustained, and are nonhormonal drugs substituted?
Menopause. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):329-35. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31818c046b.
6
4 years after withdrawal of rofecoxib: where do we stand today?
Rheumatol Int. 2008 Oct;28(12):1187-95. doi: 10.1007/s00296-008-0650-4. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
9
COX-2 selective inhibitors in the treatment of osteoarthritis.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Dec;38(3):165-87. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
10
Large-scale stopping and switching treatment with COX-2 inhibitors after the rofecoxib withdrawal.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jan;17(1):9-19. doi: 10.1002/pds.1508.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验