Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Feb;23(2):255-62. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9873-x. Epub 2011 Nov 27.
The purpose was to examine the odds of presenting with localised as opposed to more advanced cancer by place of residence to gain evidence for planning early detection initiatives.
Design, settings and participant's cases of invasive cancer reported to the NSW population-based Cancer Registry for the 1980-2008 diagnostic periods. Main outcome measure(s) between 1980 and 2008, 293,848 of reported cases (40.2%), had localised cancer at diagnosis. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine the odds of localised cancer by place of residence for all cancers sites combined while adjusting for age, sex, period of diagnosis, socioeconomic status, migrant status and prognosis (as inferred from cancer type).
Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that patients from rural areas were less likely than urban patients to present with localised cancer after adjusting for other socio-demographic factors and prognosis by cancer type (regardless of how rurality was classified). The difference ranged from 4% for remote (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.98) to 14% (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.84) for very remote compared with highly accessible areas. It is estimated that a maximum of 4,205 fewer cases of localised cancer occurred in patients from rural areas over the study period than expected from the stage distribution for urban patients. Residents aged between 30 and 74 years of age at diagnosis and those living in high socioeconomic status areas were more likely to present with localised cancer. By contrast, people aged 75 years or older at diagnosis, migrants from non-English-speaking countries and people diagnosed in more recent diagnostic periods were less likely to present with localised cancer.
Targeted strategies that specifically encourage earlier diagnosis and treatment that may subsequently influence better survival are required to increase the proportion of NSW residents presenting with localised cancer at diagnosis.
通过居住地来研究呈现局限性癌症与更晚期癌症的几率,为规划早期检测计划提供依据。
设计、设置和参与者为 1980 年至 2008 年诊断期间向新南威尔士州人群为基础的癌症登记处报告的侵袭性癌症病例。主要结果测量值 1980 年至 2008 年期间,报告病例中有 293848 例(40.2%)为诊断时局限性癌症。进行逻辑回归分析以确定所有癌症部位的居住地与局限性癌症的几率,同时调整年龄、性别、诊断时期、社会经济状况、移民状况和预后(根据癌症类型推断)。
多变量逻辑回归分析表明,调整其他社会人口因素和根据癌症类型的预后后,农村地区的患者比城市患者呈现局限性癌症的几率更小(无论农村地区如何分类)。差异范围从偏远地区的 4%(OR=0.96,95%CI 0.95-0.98)到非常偏远地区的 14%(OR=0.86,95%CI 0.79-0.84)。据估计,在研究期间,农村地区的患者中发生的局限性癌症病例比城市患者的阶段分布预期少 4205 例。诊断时年龄在 30 至 74 岁之间且居住在高社会经济地位地区的居民更有可能呈现局限性癌症。相比之下,诊断时年龄在 75 岁或以上、来自非英语国家的移民以及在最近诊断时期被诊断出的人更不可能呈现局限性癌症。
需要制定有针对性的策略,特别是鼓励更早的诊断和治疗,这可能会影响更好的生存,以增加新南威尔士州居民在诊断时呈现局限性癌症的比例。