Berg B G, Green D M
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Aug;88(2):758-66. doi: 10.1121/1.399725.
The COSS analysis suggested by Berg [B. G. Berg, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1743-1746 (1989)] is applied to a profile listening task. The listener's task is to detect an increment in the level of the middle component of an n-component spectrum. The overall level of the components is randomly selected from a 20-dB range on each presentation; thus the detection task is essentially one of detecting a change in spectral shape. To implement the COSS analysis, a small perturbation in level is added to each component of the complex. COSS functions are generated from these perturbations, and the spectral weight that the listener assigns to each component is estimated. Data are reported for n = 3, 5, and 11 components and for perturbations with standard deviations of 0.5, 1, and 2 dB. The estimated weights are similar to those derived for an optimum detector; namely, the level at the signal component is compared with the average level of the nonsignal components. This result supports the view that profile analysis involves an across-channel comparison process. The pattern of weights also provides insight into differences among listeners. In a separate experiment, the spectral weights of a very poor profile listener are estimated, and the pattern of the weights suggests reasons for the inferior detection performance.
伯格[B.G.伯格,《美国声学学会杂志》86, 1743 - 1746(1989)]提出的COSS分析应用于轮廓听力任务。听者的任务是检测n分量频谱中中间分量的电平增量。每次呈现时,各分量的总电平从20分贝的范围内随机选取;因此,检测任务本质上是检测频谱形状的变化。为了实施COSS分析,对复合信号的每个分量添加一个小的电平扰动。从这些扰动中生成COSS函数,并估计听者分配给每个分量的频谱权重。报告了n = 3、5和11分量以及标准差为0.5、1和2分贝的扰动情况下的数据。估计的权重与为最佳检测器得出的权重相似;也就是说,将信号分量处的电平与非信号分量的平均电平进行比较。这一结果支持了轮廓分析涉及跨通道比较过程的观点。权重模式也为听者之间的差异提供了见解。在另一个实验中,估计了一个非常差的轮廓听者的频谱权重,权重模式表明了检测性能较差的原因。