Suppr超能文献

使用 BLADE 技术对人肾脏的 DCE-MRI:一项在健康志愿者中的可行性研究。

DCE-MRI of the human kidney using BLADE: a feasibility study in healthy volunteers.

机构信息

Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Apr;35(4):868-74. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23509. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the degree of motion compensation in the kidney using two different sampling methods, each in their optimized settings: A BLADE k-space acquisition technique and a routinely used kidney perfusion acquisition scheme (TurboFLASH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance examinations were performed in 16 healthy volunteers on a 3 Tesla MR-system with two parameterizations of the BLADE sequence and the standard reference acquisition scheme. Signal intensity enhanced time curves were analyzed with a mathematical model and a widely published separable compartment model on cortex regions to assess robustness versus motion artifacts.

RESULTS

BLADE-measurements with a strip-width of 32 lines constituted the smallest mean values for the sum of squared errors (6065 ± 4996) compared with the measurement with a strip-width of 64 lines (13849 ± 14079) or the standard TurboFLASH (11884 ± 8076). Calculations concerning goodness of the fit of the applied compartment model yielded an overall average of the Akaike Fit Error of 732 ± 141 for BLADE (646 ± 149 for a strip-width of 32 lines, 816 ± 53 for 64 lines) and 1626 ± 303 for the TurboFLASH (TFL) sequence.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that renal dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using BLADE k-space sampling with a strip-width of 32 is significantly less sensitive to motion than a widely published Turbo-Flash sequence with nearly similar parameters.

摘要

目的

使用两种不同的采样方法(BLADE 单次激发 K 空间采集技术和常规使用的肾脏灌注采集方案(TurboFLASH))评估肾脏的运动补偿程度。

材料与方法

在 3T MR 系统上对 16 名健康志愿者进行了动态对比增强磁共振检查,分别对 BLADE 序列的两种参数化和标准参考采集方案进行了检查。使用数学模型和广泛发表的可分离隔室模型对皮质区域的信号强度增强时间曲线进行分析,以评估其对运动伪影的稳健性。

结果

BLADE 测量中,带宽度为 32 线的测量值的平方和误差(6065 ± 4996)最小,与带宽度为 64 线(13849 ± 14079)或标准 TurboFLASH(11884 ± 8076)的测量值相比。应用隔室模型的拟合优度计算得出,BLADE 的平均 Akaike 拟合误差为 732 ± 141(32 线带宽度为 646 ± 149,64 线带宽度为 816 ± 53),TurboFLASH(TFL)序列为 1626 ± 303。

结论

我们证明了使用带宽度为 32 的 BLADE K 空间采样进行肾脏动态对比增强磁共振成像,与具有相似参数的广泛发表的 Turbo-Flash 序列相比,对运动的敏感性明显降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验