Bakhashi Babita, Gupta S K, Rajagopala Manjusha, Bhuyan C
Department of Shalya Tantra, Institute for Post Graduate Teaching and Research in Ayurveda, Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, India.
Ayu. 2010 Apr;31(2):240-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.72408.
Sushruta has mentioned different methods of management of diseases, such as Bheshaja karma, Kshara Karma, Agni karma, Shastrakarma and Raktamokshana. The approach of Agni karma has been mentioned in the context of diseases like Arsha, Arbuda, Bhagandar, Sira, Snayu, Asthi, Sandhigata Vata Vikaras and Gridhrasi. Gridhrasi is seen as a panic condition in the society as it is one of the burning problems, especially in the life of daily laborers. It is characterized by distinct pain starting from Sphik Pradesha (gluteal region) and goes down toward the Parshni Pratyanguli (foot region) of the affected side of leg. On the basis of symptomatology, Gridhrasi may be simulated with the disease sciatica in modern parlance. In modern medicine, the disease sciatica is managed only with potent analgesics or some sort of surgical interventions which have their own limitations and adverse effects, whereas in Ayurveda, various treatment modalities like Siravedha, Agni karma, Basti Chikitsa and palliative medicines are used successfully. Among these, Agni karma procedure seems to be more effective by providing timely relief. Shalakas for Agni karma, made up of different Dhatus like gold, silver, copper, iron, etc. for different stages of the disease conditions, have been proposed. In the present work, a comparative study of Agni karma by using iron, copper and previously studied Panchadhatu Shalaka in Gridhrashi has been conducted. A total of 22 patients were treated in three groups. Result of the entire study showed that Agni karma by Panchadhatu Shalaka provided better result in combating the symptoms, especially Ruka and Tandra, while Lauhadhatu Shalaka gave better results in combating symptoms of Spanadana and Gaurava. In the meantime, Tamradhatu Shalaka provided better effect in controlling symptoms like Toda, Stambha and Aruchi. Fifty percent patients in Panchadhatu Shalaka (Group A) were completely relieved. In Lauhadhatu Shalaka (Group B), the success rate was 00.00%, and in Tamradhatu Shalaka (Group C), the percentage of success rate was 14.28%. After analyzing the data, Tamradhatu Shalaka was found to be more effective than Lauha and Panchadhatu Shalakas.
苏什鲁塔提到了不同的疾病治疗方法,如药物治疗、腐蚀疗法、火疗法、手术疗法和放血疗法。火疗法的方法在诸如肛瘘、肿瘤、肛瘘、血管病、肌腱病、骨病、关节周围风邪病症和坐骨神经痛等疾病的背景下被提及。坐骨神经痛在社会上被视为一种令人恐慌的病症,因为它是一个亟待解决的问题,尤其是在体力劳动者的生活中。其特征是从臀部区域开始出现明显疼痛,并向下延伸至患侧腿部的足部区域。根据症状学,坐骨神经痛在现代医学中可被模拟为坐骨神经痛这种疾病。在现代医学中,坐骨神经痛这种疾病仅通过强效镇痛药或某种手术干预来治疗,而这些方法都有其自身的局限性和不良反应,而在阿育吠陀医学中,诸如针刺疗法、火疗法、灌肠疗法和姑息性药物等各种治疗方式都被成功应用。其中,火疗法通过及时缓解疼痛似乎更为有效。人们提出了由金、银、铜、铁等不同组织构成的用于不同疾病阶段的火疗法探针。在本研究中,对使用铁、铜和先前研究过的五元素探针进行火疗法治疗坐骨神经痛进行了对比研究。总共22名患者被分为三组进行治疗。整个研究结果表明,五元素探针进行火疗法在对抗症状方面,尤其是在缓解发热和寒战方面效果更好,而铁元素探针在对抗刺痛和沉重感症状方面效果更好。与此同时,铜元素探针在控制麻木、僵硬和食欲不振等症状方面效果更佳。五元素探针组(A组)有50%的患者完全缓解。在铁元素探针组(B组),成功率为00.00%,在铜元素探针组(C组),成功率为14.28%。在分析数据后,发现铜元素探针比铁元素和五元素探针更有效。