U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jan 17;46(2):945-53. doi: 10.1021/es2031455. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
The application of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) technologies for the rapid identification of fecal bacteria in environmental waters is being considered for use as a national water quality metric in the United States. The transition from research tool to a standardized protocol requires information on the reproducibility and sources of variation associated with qPCR methodology across laboratories. This study examines interlaboratory variability in the measurement of enterococci and Bacteroidales concentrations from standardized, spiked, and environmental sources of DNA using the Entero1a and GenBac3 qPCR methods, respectively. Comparisons are based on data generated from eight different research facilities. Special attention was placed on the influence of the DNA isolation step and effect of simplex and multiplex amplification approaches on interlaboratory variability. Results suggest that a crude lysate is sufficient for DNA isolation unless environmental samples contain substances that can inhibit qPCR amplification. No appreciable difference was observed between simplex and multiplex amplification approaches. Overall, interlaboratory variability levels remained low (<10% coefficient of variation) regardless of qPCR protocol.
定量实时 PCR(qPCR)技术在环境水中快速鉴定粪便细菌的应用正被考虑作为美国的国家水质指标。从研究工具到标准化方案的转变需要了解 qPCR 方法在实验室间的重现性和变异来源的信息。本研究使用 Entero1a 和 GenBac3 qPCR 方法分别研究了标准化、添加和环境来源 DNA 中肠球菌和拟杆菌浓度测量的实验室间变异性。比较基于来自八个不同研究机构的数据。特别关注 DNA 分离步骤的影响以及单重和多重扩增方法对实验室间变异性的影响。结果表明,粗提物足以用于 DNA 分离,除非环境样品中含有可抑制 qPCR 扩增的物质。在单重和多重扩增方法之间没有观察到明显的差异。总体而言,无论 qPCR 方案如何,实验室间变异性水平仍然较低(<10%变异系数)。