Suppr超能文献

1.2%磷酸克林霉素-3%过氧化苯甲酰固定剂量复方凝胶治疗寻常痤疮的安全性和有效性:一项3期、多中心、随机、双盲、活性药物对照和赋形剂对照研究

Safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and vehicle-controlled study.

作者信息

Eichenfield Lawrence F, Alió Sáenz Alessandra B

机构信息

Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123-4204, USA.

出版信息

J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Dec;10(12):1382-96.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Topical fixed-combination therapy containing 1% clindamycin as 1.2% clindamycin phosphate (CLNP) and 3% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is an effective treatment for acne vulgaris (acne).

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate that the combination of 1.2% CLNP with lower strength BPO (CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%) in a gel formulation is superior to each individual ingredient, CLNP 1.2% and BPO 3%, and vehicle gel.

METHODS

A total of 1,319 patients with acne, aged 12 years or older, were enrolled and randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%, CLNP 1.2% gel, BPO 3% gel, or vehicle gel once-daily in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled study. Subjects were evaluated at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 or early termination. Assessment of efficacy was evaluated using a six-point Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) and Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) of acne severity and lesion counts (inflammatory, non-inflammatory, and total). Safety assessments included skin tolerability and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A greater proportion of subjects who used CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% gel (39%) had a two grade improvement in ISGA from baseline to week 12 compared with CLNP 1.2% (25%; P<0.001), BPO 3% (30%; P=0.016), and vehicle (18%; P<0.001). CLNP 1.2%- BPO 3% was superior to CLNP 1.2% and vehicle alone in the absolute reduction from baseline to week 12 in all three lesion types (P<0.001 all pair-wise comparisons). CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% was superior to BPO 3% alone in the absolute reduction from baseline to week 12 in inflammatory (P=0.015) and total (P=0.032) lesion counts. The incidence of product-related AEs was low and similar in all study groups (1% with CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%, 2% with CLNP 1.2%, 2% with BPO 3%, and 2% with vehicle). Local tolerability assessments showed similar minimal changes from baseline to week 12 in all study groups.

CONCLUSION

CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% gel provides superior efficacy to improve ISGA score and reduce inflammatory and total lesion counts compared with the individual active ingredients (CLNP 1.2% and BPO 3%) and vehicle, while maintaining a highly favorable safety and tolerability profile similar to BPO 3% alone.

摘要

背景

含1%克林霉素磷酸酯(以1.2%克林霉素磷酸酯形式存在,CLNP)和3%过氧化苯甲酰(BPO)的外用固定复方疗法是寻常痤疮(痤疮)的一种有效治疗方法。

目的

证明凝胶制剂中1.2% CLNP与较低浓度BPO(CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%)联合使用优于各单一成分(CLNP 1.2%和BPO 3%)以及赋形剂凝胶。

方法

总共招募了1319名12岁及以上的痤疮患者,并将其随机分为四组(1:1:1:1),在一项为期12周的多中心、双盲、平行组、赋形剂对照研究中,每日一次接受CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%、CLNP 1.2%凝胶、BPO 3%凝胶或赋形剂凝胶治疗。在基线、第2、4、8和12周或提前终止时对受试者进行评估。使用六点研究者静态整体评估(ISGA)和受试者对痤疮严重程度及皮损计数(炎性、非炎性和总数)的整体评估(SGA)来评估疗效。安全性评估包括皮肤耐受性和不良事件(AE)。

结果

与CLNP 1.2%(25%;P<0.001)、BPO 3%(30%;P=0.016)和赋形剂(18%;P<0.001)相比,使用CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%凝胶的受试者中有更大比例(39%)在从基线到第12周时ISGA改善了两级。在从基线到第12周所有三种皮损类型的绝对减少量方面,CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%优于CLNP 1.2%和单独的赋形剂(所有两两比较P<0.001)。在从基线到第12周炎性(P=0.015)和总数(P=0.032)皮损计数的绝对减少量方面,CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%优于单独的BPO 3%。所有研究组中与产品相关的AE发生率都很低且相似(CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%为1%,CLNP 1.2%为2%,BPO 3%为2%,赋形剂为2%)。局部耐受性评估显示,所有研究组从基线到第12周的变化都很小且相似。

结论

与单一活性成分(CLNP 1.2%和BPO 3%)及赋形剂相比,CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%凝胶在改善ISGA评分以及减少炎性和总数皮损计数方面具有更优疗效,同时保持了与单独使用BPO 3%相似的高度良好的安全性和耐受性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验