Suppr超能文献

青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者后路器械辅助脊柱融合术中皮下闭式引流与传统闭式引流的比较:一项随机对照试验

Comparison between subcutaneous closed-suction drainage and conventional closed-suction drainage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion: a randomized control trial.

作者信息

Liang Jinqian, Qiu Guixing, Chua Sooyong, Shen Jianxiong

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Jul;26(5):256-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182400897.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous closed-suction drainage in reducing blood loss as compared with conventional closed-suction drainage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cases undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion.

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous closed-suction drainage is reported to be a reasonable alternative to intra-articular indwelling closed-suction drainage and to that of no usage of any drainage system in knee arthroplasty. However, little is reported about the use of subcutaneous closed-suction drainage in adolescents idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion.

METHODS

A total of 105 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion were randomized into 2 groups of either a subcutaneous drainage or a conventional closed-wound suction drainage system. These 2 groups were compared for demographic distribution, blood loss (hemoglobin/hematocrit changes, transfusion requirements), and incidence of wound problems (requirements for dressing reinforcement, oozing, subcutaneous hematoma, ecchymosis, infection).

RESULTS

Mean drainage volume was less (P=0.000) in the subcutaneous closed-wound suction drainage group compared with the conventional closed-wound suction drainage group (42 vs. 631 mL). The groups were statistically similar in terms of hemoglobin and hematocrit values obtained on the third postoperative day (10.60 vs. 9.52 g/dL, P=0.110; 30.85% vs. 27.82%, P=0.226), on discharge (10.90 vs. 9.75 g/dL, P=0.114; 31.10% vs. 28.13%, P=0.147), transfusion requirements (31.2% vs. 45.6%, P=0.133), and incidence of wound problems. However, the core temperature values were higher in subcutaneous closed-wound suction drainage group compared with the conventional closed-wound suction drainage group (P=0.001), and the duration of fever was longer in the former compared with the latter (P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that subcutaneous closed-suction drainage offers a reasonable alternative to closed-wound suction drainage in adolescents idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性随机对照临床研究。

目的

评估在接受后路器械脊柱融合术的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸病例中,皮下闭式吸引引流与传统闭式吸引引流相比在减少失血方面的疗效。

背景

据报道,在膝关节置换术中,皮下闭式吸引引流是关节内留置闭式吸引引流和不使用任何引流系统的合理替代方法。然而,关于皮下闭式吸引引流在接受后路器械脊柱融合术的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者中的应用报道较少。

方法

总共105例接受后路器械脊柱融合术的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者被随机分为皮下引流组或传统伤口闭式吸引引流系统组。比较两组的人口统计学分布、失血量(血红蛋白/血细胞比容变化、输血需求)和伤口问题发生率(敷料加固需求、渗血、皮下血肿、瘀斑、感染)。

结果

皮下伤口闭式吸引引流组的平均引流量低于传统伤口闭式吸引引流组(42 vs. 631 mL,P = 0.000)。两组在术后第三天获得的血红蛋白和血细胞比容值(10.60 vs. 9.52 g/dL,P = 0.110;30.85% vs. 27.82%,P = 0.226)、出院时(10.90 vs. 9.75 g/dL,P = 0.114;31.10% vs. 28.13%,P = 0.147)、输血需求(31.2% vs. 45.6%,P = 0.133)和伤口问题发生率方面在统计学上相似。然而,皮下伤口闭式吸引引流组的核心体温值高于传统伤口闭式吸引引流组(P = 0.001),且前者的发热持续时间长于后者(P = 0.008)。

结论

数据表明,在接受后路器械脊柱融合术的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者中,皮下闭式吸引引流是伤口闭式吸引引流的合理替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验