Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Blood. 2012 Mar 15;119(11):2644-56. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-371971. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
We evaluated HLA-compatible donor leukocyte infusions (DLIs) and HLA-compatible or HLA-disparate EBV-specific T cells (EBV-CTLs) in 49 hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with biopsy-proven EBV-lymphoproliferative disease (EBV-LPD). DLIs and EBV-CTLs each induced durable complete or partial remissions in 73% and 68% of treated patients including 74% and 72% of patients surviving ≥ 8 days after infusion, respectively. Reversible acute GVHD occurred in recipients of DLIs (17%) but not EBV-CTLs. The probability of complete response was significantly lower among patients with multiorgan involvement. In responders, DLIs and EBV-CTLs regularly induced exponential increases in EBV-specific CTL precursor (EBV-CTLp) frequencies within 7-14 days, with subsequent clearance of EBV viremia and resolution of disease. In nonresponders, EBV-CTLps did not increase and EBV viremia persisted. Treatment failures were correlated with impaired T-cell recognition of tumor targets. Either donor-derived EBV-CTLs that had been sensitized with autologous BLCLs transformed by EBV strain B95.8 could not lyse spontaneous donor-derived EBV-transformed BLCLs expanded from the patient's blood or biopsied tumor or they failed to lyse their targets because they were selectively restricted by HLA alleles not shared by the EBV-LPD. Therefore, either unselected DLIs or EBV-specific CTLs can eradicate both untreated and Rituxan-resistant lymphomatous EBV-LPD, with failures ascribable to impaired T-cell recognition of tumor-associated viral antigens or their presenting HLA alleles.
我们评估了 HLA 相容供者白细胞输注(DLI)和 HLA 相容或 HLA 不同的 EBV 特异性 T 细胞(EBV-CTL)在 49 例经活检证实的 EBV 淋巴增殖性疾病(EBV-LPD)造血细胞移植受者中的作用。DLI 和 EBV-CTL 分别在 73%和 68%的治疗患者中诱导了持久的完全或部分缓解,包括分别有 74%和 72%的患者在输注后存活≥8 天。DLI 受者发生可逆性急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)(17%),而 EBV-CTL 则未发生。多器官受累患者的完全缓解率明显较低。在应答者中,DLI 和 EBV-CTL 在 7-14 天内定期诱导 EBV 特异性 CTL 前体(EBV-CTLp)频率呈指数增长,随后清除 EBV 病毒血症并缓解疾病。在无应答者中,EBV-CTLp 没有增加,EBV 病毒血症持续存在。治疗失败与 T 细胞对肿瘤靶标的识别受损有关。用 EBV 株 B95.8 转化的自体 BLCL 致敏的供体来源的 EBV-CTL 不能裂解来自患者血液或活检肿瘤扩增的自发供体来源的 EBV 转化的 BLCL,或者它们不能裂解其靶标,因为它们被患者的 HLA 等位基因选择性限制,这些 HLA 等位基因与 EBV-LPD 不同。因此,未选择的 DLI 或 EBV 特异性 CTL 都可以清除未经治疗和利妥昔单抗耐药的淋巴瘤性 EBV-LPD,失败归因于 T 细胞对肿瘤相关病毒抗原或其呈递 HLA 等位基因的识别受损。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025-4-25
Transfus Med Hemother. 2024-9-25
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024-10
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2023-7-3
Cell Cycle. 2009-2-1
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008-9
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008-8