Suppr超能文献

在危地马拉识别骨折高危个体。

Identifying individuals at risk for fracture in Guatemala.

机构信息

Osteoporosis Medical Center, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028042. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The FRAX calculator combines a set of clinical risk factors with country-specific incidence rates to determine the ten-year absolute risk of major osteoporotic fracture. However, regional or country-specific databases from Central American countries are not available. We compared the use of various FRAX databases and the Pluijm algorithm in determining risk of fracture.

METHODS

We collected clinical risk factor data needed for the FRAX calculator and Pluijm algorithm of Hispanic women in Guatemala and calculated the FRAX absolute risk measures of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture. Subjects were postmenopausal women greater than age 40 with no history of using medication that affect bone. A random sample of 204 women in 34 different regions women in Guatemala City was visited in their homes to complete the surveys. The Pluijm risk score and FRAX risk score using the US Hispanic, Spain, and Mexican databases were calculated.

RESULTS

We used the US NOF guidelines for treatment which suggest a treatment threshold for patients with a 10-year hip fracture probability ≥ 3% or a 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk ≥ 20%. The number of patients meeting the suggested threshold limits for treatment using the Spain and Mexico calculators were identical. There was 100% conformity in threshold limits for both hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk. The mean conformity for any fracture risk between US Hispanic and the other two databases was 97.5%. Conformity was 99.0% based on major osteoporotic fracture and 97.5% based on risk of hip fracture. The Pluijm evaluation shows conformity of 87.2% and 83.3%, respectively, when compared to the US Hispanic and Spain/Mexico FRAX thresholds for risk of fracture.

DISCUSSION

Although the different FRAX databases provide variations in the absolute risk of fracture, the overall conformity to treatment thresholds amongst the US Hispanic, Spain, and Mexico databases show the database used would have little effect as to the decision to treat. The Pluijm tool conforms to the FRAX thresholds and can be used as well. It does not matter which country-specific calculator or assessment tool is used, as there are a similar number of patients that would meet the intervention threshold.

摘要

简介

FRAX 计算器结合了一组临床危险因素和特定国家的发病率,以确定 10 年内主要骨质疏松性骨折的绝对风险。然而,中美洲国家没有可用的地区或国家特定数据库。我们比较了各种 FRAX 数据库和 Pluijm 算法在确定骨折风险方面的应用。

方法

我们收集了危地马拉西班牙裔女性进行 FRAX 计算器和 Pluijm 算法所需的临床危险因素数据,并计算了主要骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折的 FRAX 绝对风险测量值。研究对象为绝经后、年龄大于 40 岁、无使用影响骨骼药物史的女性。对危地马拉市 34 个不同地区的 204 名女性进行了随机抽样,在她们家中完成了调查。计算了使用美国西班牙裔、西班牙和墨西哥数据库的 Pluijm 风险评分和 FRAX 风险评分。

结果

我们使用了美国国家骨质疏松基金会的治疗指南,该指南建议对于髋部骨折概率≥ 3%或 10 年内主要骨质疏松性骨折风险≥ 20%的患者进行治疗。使用西班牙和墨西哥计算器,符合治疗建议阈值的患者数量相同。髋部和主要骨质疏松性骨折风险的阈值限制完全一致。美国西班牙裔与其他两个数据库之间任何骨折风险的平均一致性为 97.5%。基于主要骨质疏松性骨折的一致性为 99.0%,基于髋部骨折风险的一致性为 97.5%。Pluijm 评估显示,与美国西班牙裔和西班牙/墨西哥 FRAX 骨折风险阈值相比,一致性分别为 87.2%和 83.3%。

讨论

尽管不同的 FRAX 数据库提供了骨折绝对风险的变化,但美国西班牙裔、西班牙和墨西哥数据库之间的总体治疗阈值一致性表明,数据库的使用对治疗决策影响不大。Pluijm 工具符合 FRAX 阈值,也可以使用。无论使用哪个国家特定的计算器或评估工具,都有类似数量的患者符合干预阈值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8212/3226662/0718f9118491/pone.0028042.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验