Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, McGuire VAMC, Richmond, VA 23249, USA.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(3):261-9. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0702.
Bone loss is a common and often debilitating condition that accompanies spinal cord injury. Because bone loss after spinal cord injury is multifactorial, it can be difficult to assess and treat. This process becomes even more complex as secondary conditions associated with aging are introduced.
There are two purposes of this literature review. The first is to summarize information concerning the mechanisms of bone loss and osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. The second is to summarize existing data concerning the effects of exercise on bone loss after spinal cord injury.
Literature was reviewed concerning the bone loss process and the non-pharmacological treatment options for ameliorating bone loss after spinal cord injury.
(Part One) Osteoporosis is universal in persons with chronic complete spinal cord injury, which increases the risk of bone fracture. Bone loss after spinal cord injury is both sublesional and regional with the greatest areas of bone demineralization being in the sublesional trabecular laden areas of the distal and proximal epiphyses of the femur and tibia. (Part Two) While passive weight bearing of paralyzed lower extremities appears to be ineffective, stressing the bones through muscular contractions initiated by electrical stimulation (FES) have yielded positive results in some cases. The intensity, frequency, and duration of stress to the bones appear to be important determinants of improved bone parameters. Although further quantification of these components is needed, some generalized guidelines can be deduced from completed research. Intensities showing positive results have been loads of one to one and a half times body weight for FES exercise or having participants FES cycle at their highest power output. Safety precautions must be used to decrease risk of bone fracture. Generally, the frequency is effective with three or more weekly exercise sessions. Studies of duration suggest that several months to one or more years of FES are necessary.
In order to promote healthy and independent aging in patients with spinal cord injury, it is important to understand the processes, consequences and effective treatments involved with bone loss.
骨丢失是一种常见且常使人虚弱的病症,常伴随脊髓损伤出现。由于脊髓损伤后的骨丢失是多因素的,因此评估和治疗都很困难。随着与衰老相关的继发性疾病的出现,这个过程变得更加复杂。
本文有两个目的。一是总结与脊髓损伤后骨丢失和骨质疏松症相关的机制信息。二是总结关于运动对脊髓损伤后骨丢失影响的现有数据。
对骨丢失过程以及改善脊髓损伤后骨丢失的非药物治疗选择进行了文献回顾。
(第一部分)慢性完全性脊髓损伤患者普遍存在骨质疏松症,这增加了骨折的风险。脊髓损伤后的骨丢失既有下位损伤,也有区域性的,骨矿物质丢失最严重的部位是股骨和胫骨的下位骨小梁和近、远端骨骺。(第二部分)虽然瘫痪下肢的被动负重似乎没有效果,但通过电刺激(FES)引发的肌肉收缩对骨骼施加应力,在某些情况下已经取得了积极的效果。施加于骨骼的应力的强度、频率和持续时间似乎是改善骨参数的重要决定因素。虽然还需要进一步对这些因素进行量化,但可以从已完成的研究中推断出一些一般性的准则。已显示出积极效果的强度为 FES 运动的 1 至 1.5 倍体重或让参与者以其最高功率输出进行 FES 循环。必须采取安全预防措施以降低骨折风险。一般来说,每周进行三到五次以上的运动是有效的。关于持续时间的研究表明,需要进行几个月到一年或更长时间的 FES。
为了促进脊髓损伤患者健康和独立地衰老,了解骨丢失涉及的过程、后果和有效治疗方法非常重要。