• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

作者信息

Park Jongkyung, Kwak Huiyong, Kim Sung Geun, Lee Seong

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Mar;22(2):142-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0253. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2011.0253
PMID:22145571
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy is becoming popular for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Since it was first described, laparoscopic appendectomy has been modified various times for reducing pain and improving cosmetic results. Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) may reduce more postoperative trauma and obtain reliable cosmetic results. We compared the safety and feasibility of this technique with those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Between November 2008 and July 2009, 104 patients were enrolled in this study. Their diagnoses were performed by computed tomography scan. The demographic findings and surgical outcomes such as operation time, pathology, postoperative pain score, hospital stay, and complications of the SPLA group were analyzed and compared with those of the CLA group.

RESULTS

SPLA was completed in 42 patients, and 62 patients underwent CLA. Mean age was 29.9 years in the CLA group and 23.9 years in the SPLA group. The average body mass index of patients was 23.0 kg/m(2) in the CLA group and 20.5 kg/m(2) in the SPLA group. Mean operation time was 55.8 minutes in the CLA group and 51.7 minutes in the SPLA group. There was no conversion to open appendectomy in both groups. No major complications were encountered in the two groups. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.9 days for the CLA group and 2.6 days for the SPLA group. There were no deaths in either group.

CONCLUSION

SPLA is a safe technique and shows excellent cosmetic results. This is an easy procedure for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon even with conventional laparoscopic instruments. It remains to be evaluated in cases of perforated appendicitis and periappendiceal abscess.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术在治疗急性阑尾炎方面正变得越来越流行。自首次被描述以来,腹腔镜阑尾切除术已多次改进以减轻疼痛并改善美容效果。单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SPLA)可能会减少更多的术后创伤并获得可靠的美容效果。我们比较了该技术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)的安全性和可行性。

对象与方法

2008年11月至2009年7月,104例患者纳入本研究。通过计算机断层扫描进行诊断。分析SPLA组的人口统计学结果和手术结果,如手术时间、病理、术后疼痛评分、住院时间和并发症,并与CLA组进行比较。

结果

42例患者完成了SPLA,62例患者接受了CLA。CLA组的平均年龄为29.9岁,SPLA组为23.9岁。CLA组患者的平均体重指数为23.0kg/m²,SPLA组为20.5kg/m²。CLA组的平均手术时间为55.8分钟,SPLA组为51.7分钟。两组均未转为开腹阑尾切除术。两组均未发生重大并发症。CLA组的平均术后住院时间为2.9天,SPLA组为2.6天。两组均无死亡病例。

结论

SPLA是一种安全的技术,美容效果极佳。对于有经验的腹腔镜外科医生来说,即使使用传统的腹腔镜器械,这也是一个简单的手术。在阑尾穿孔和阑尾周围脓肿的病例中,仍有待评估。

相似文献

1
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Mar;22(2):142-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0253. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
2
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):214-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bde4.
3
Single-port laparoscopic surgery in acute appendicitis: retrospective comparative analysis for 618 patients.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎:618例患者的回顾性对比分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4968-4975. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4840-y. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy, a Multicenter Randomized Control Trial: A Feasible and Safe Alternative to Standard Laparoscopy.传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术与单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项多中心随机对照试验,一种可行且安全的标准腹腔镜替代方法
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Dec;29(12):1577-1584. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0460. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
5
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence from randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized comparative studies.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:来自随机对照试验和非随机对照研究的证据
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Feb;24(1):12-21. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182937da4.
6
Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in children.儿童单孔与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术术后疼痛的比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 Aug;7(3):237-40. doi: 10.1111/ases.12118. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
7
Suprapubic single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.耻骨上单切口与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术
J Surg Res. 2016 Jan;200(1):131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.032. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
8
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: the single working channel technique.使用传统器械的经脐单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单工作通道技术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):208-11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827f5d.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
10
Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Single-center Experience.老年复杂性急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):366-368. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000447.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
2
Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.单孔阑尾切除术后手术部位感染:文献系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 8;9:919744. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.919744. eCollection 2022.
3
European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.
欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)关于单切口内镜手术的共识声明。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):996-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06693-2. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as a training procedure for surgical residents.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为外科住院医师培训手术的安全性和可行性。
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):13-17. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_136_18.
5
Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis.单孔腹腔镜手术、传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术及开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎效果的贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Dec;14(6):5908-5916. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5343. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
6
Single-port laparoscopic surgery in acute appendicitis: retrospective comparative analysis for 618 patients.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎:618例患者的回顾性对比分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4968-4975. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4840-y. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Conventional Laparoscopic Appendicectomy and Laparoscope-Assisted Appendicectomy: a Comparative Study.传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术与腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术:一项对比研究。
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 2):330-4. doi: 10.1007/s12262-013-0824-5. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
8
Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic appendectomy: a case-matched comparative analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:病例匹配的对比分析
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3837-7. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
9
Prospective assessment of trocar-specific morbidity in laparoscopy.腹腔镜检查中特定套管针相关发病率的前瞻性评估。
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3089-96. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2683-z.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.比较单切口与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2014 Aug;38(8):1937-46. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2535-x.